On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:13 +0800, Onno Benschop wrote:
> My experience in this scenario is that if you go down the path of
> individual pairing that paired support person becomes the single
> contact
> point for that user from then on. It happens today when a support
> request gets resolved the us
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:58:49 +0800
> John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Evan wrote:
>> > We also seem to have a duplication of effort on several fronts. At
>> > last glance we have:
>> >
>> > - mailing lists
>> > - IRC
>> > - wiki
>> > - launchpad
>> > - launchpad ans
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:58:49 +0800
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Evan wrote:
> > We also seem to have a duplication of effort on several fronts. At
> > last glance we have:
> >
> > - mailing lists
> > - IRC
> > - wiki
> > - launchpad
> > - launchpad answers
> > - for
I think the FAQ/flowchart/chatroom model could work very well in other
places, but the Signpost is just about pointing people in the right
direction - providing solutions is outside our modest scope.
You've already got a chatroom in #ubuntu, so the next thing is to start
writing answers. I wou
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Evan wrote:
> We also seem to have a duplication of effort on several fronts. At last
> glance we have:
>
> - mailing lists
> - IRC
> - wiki
> - launchpad
> - launchpad answers
> - forums
I wrote a blueprint for maintaining a database of errors. I suggest
that for a
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:13:26 +0800
Onno Benschop wrote:
> On 09/07/09 01:28, C de-Avillez wrote:
> > I can see something like this working -- as long as the requester
> > gets paired with one single person, in a PVT IRC session (or
> > something similar). If we just drop the requester into, say,
On 09/07/09 01:28, C de-Avillez wrote:
> I can see something like this working -- as long as the requester gets
> paired with one single person, in a PVT IRC session (or something
> similar). If we just drop the requester into, say, the #ubuntu channel,
> then we will not have accomplished anything
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:28 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:47 -0400, Evan wrote:
>
> >
> > The only issue I can find with this approach is that many new
> > users are
> > coming from windows. Have you tried using windows "help"? It
> > does use
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:47 -0400, Evan wrote:
>
> The only issue I can find with this approach is that many new
> users are
> coming from windows. Have you tried using windows "help"? It
> does use
> an approach similar to this, and I would be afra
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:47:19 -0400
Evan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Charlie Kravetz
> > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:14:53 -0400
> > Evan wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Sayers <
> > > andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:14:53 -0400
> Evan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Sayers <
> > andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I think the model we're heading towards with the signpost is that
> > > the wi
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:14:53 -0400
Evan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Sayers <
> andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote:
>
> > I think the model we're heading towards with the signpost is that
> > the wiki page contains questions that have been asked before, while
> > IRC an
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Sayers <
andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote:
> I think the model we're heading towards with the signpost is that the
> wiki page contains questions that have been asked before, while IRC and
> the wiki discussion page are for new questions.
>
Makes s
I think the model we're heading towards with the signpost is that the
wiki page contains questions that have been asked before, while IRC and
the wiki discussion page are for new questions.
If it works, I think #ubuntu might want to look at the signpost model.
Being able to click "I have a prob
> As soon as more than x people actively seeking help are on a channel (not
> sure how many in this case), it becomes hard for new people on the channel
> to get attention. The trick would be to get the volunteers onto the right
> subchannel so that when someone on #ubuntu points the user to #ubunt
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Onno Benschop wrote:
> On 03/07/09 11:44, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> > when someone comes to you with a problem, first
> > fix the presenting problem, then fix the second-order problem that
> > caused it, then the third-order problem, and so on back to the original
> >
On 03/07/09 11:44, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> when someone comes to you with a problem, first
> fix the presenting problem, then fix the second-order problem that
> caused it, then the third-order problem, and so on back to the original
> source. Although this significantly increases the amount of
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 19:47 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> I'm coming to a similar conclusion from the opposite direction. A quick
> chat in #ubuntu-signpost lead me to start writing this:
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Signpost
The only problem I see is that you redirect people wh
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:23:19 -0400
Evan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Evan R. Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > 2009/7/3 Evan :
> > > I've been subscribed to this list and filing bugs for over a year
> > > now,
> > and I
> > > hadn't even heard of Launchpad Answers before now. Maybe I live
> > > u
Evan wrote:
> Launchpad is for bug reporting and tracking, beyond that I have no idea
> where the actual division of responsibilities lies. Perhaps clarifying
> that (ex: Wiki is for Howtos only, forums are only for ...) and then
> providing a meta-support page for each topic would help. So some
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Evan R. Murphy wrote:
> 2009/7/3 Evan :
> > I've been subscribed to this list and filing bugs for over a year now,
> and I
> > hadn't even heard of Launchpad Answers before now. Maybe I live under a
> > rock, but I think promotion / awareness would go a long way.
>
> For the latter, we should have a review group to:
> * look at the questions/answers, and
> * verify correctness,
> * edit if needed (clarifying the question and answer), and
> * classify the question following a (given) taxonomy.
>
> Following from here:
>
> * once a question/answer has been
2009/7/3 Evan :
> I've been subscribed to this list and filing bugs for over a year now, and I
> hadn't even heard of Launchpad Answers before now. Maybe I live under a
> rock, but I think promotion / awareness would go a long way.
I dream about a much tighter integration of all the community
disc
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:36 -0400, Andrew SB wrote:
> >
> > I like this. So maybe a rating system more along the lines of, "Did
> > this answer fix your problem?", instead of, "Digg it".
>
> Some thoughts:
>
> This sounds just like Launchpad Answers to me. How would the idea
> you're talking abo
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Evan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Andrew SB wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Evan R. Murphy
>> wrote:
>> >> I would propose that we have a better metric for selecting the best
>> >> answer, in that the person posing the question could sele
> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:03:44 -0400
> From: Evan
> Subject: Re: Standing in the street trying to hear yourself think
>
> Again, someone in the Audio
> metaforum (who presumably knows something about audio) tells them it's a
> driver issue, and moves their post a lev
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Andrew SB wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Evan R. Murphy
> wrote:
> >> I would propose that we have a better metric for selecting the best
> >> answer, in that the person posing the question could select the
> >> answer that fixed the problem for them,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Evan R. Murphy wrote:
>> I would propose that we have a better metric for selecting the best
>> answer, in that the person posing the question could select the
>> answer that fixed the problem for them, again this ties in with the
>> task orientated nature of this
Hi all,
2009/7/2 Tim Hawkins :
> I would agree that The yahoo Answers model represents a "wisdom of the
> crowds" approach, and you are correct
> in your assessment that this can lead to distortions. [...]
> On yahoo answers many of the responses that are chosen as top answers,
> are subjective in
On ven, 2009-07-03 at 10:10 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> On gio, 2009-07-02 at 21:03 -0400, Evan wrote:
> > Coincidentally, Bryce recently posted a couple of blog posts dealing
> > with "Me too" storms on launchpad [1]+[2] which are related.
> >
> >
>
> They want their problem fixed, they ca
I would agree that The yahoo Answers model represents a "wisdom of the
crowds" approach, and you are correct
in your assessment that this can lead to distortions. However I was
only suggesting this as an example model, and that
there could be mechanisms built into the points system that would
Would the production of a system similar to the "Yahoo Answers"
approach help with some of this, Yahoo Answers
awards points to answers that are chosen as top answers for various
questions, and in essence becomes a "living FAQ". Its more
task orientated than the wiki, as its based on a question
On gio, 2009-07-02 at 21:03 -0400, Evan wrote:
> Coincidentally, Bryce recently posted a couple of blog posts dealing
> with "Me too" storms on launchpad [1]+[2] which are related.
>
>
They want their problem fixed, they can do nothing, they feel
frustrated, plus, they are used to small groups o
The Ubuntu community is growing, and as Evan mentioned, our current
channels of communication can only support a finite rate of messages.
So there are only two possible solutions: increase the supply of
meat-bandwidth, or decrease the demand. Other posts have interesting
ideas about increasing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Sayers <
andrew-ubuntu-de...@pileofstuff.org> wrote:
> Evan wrote:
>
>
> I like this idea in principle, but in practice I'd be worried about
> messages being pushed back and forth between forums - your sound driver
> breaks, and the audio forum pushes your
Evan wrote:
I like this idea in principle, but in practice I'd be worried about
messages being pushed back and forth between forums - your sound driver
breaks, and the audio forum pushes your question to the driver forum,
which pushes you back to the sound forum, ad nauseum.
I suspect the ans
Coincidentally, Bryce recently posted a couple of blog posts dealing with
"Me too" storms on launchpad [1]+[2] which are related.
I don't claim to be an expert on this, but as I see it the problem comes
down to channels. Various channels of communication can hold different
numbers of active partic
Hello Onno,
Your post is very well written and some of the projects beeing worked on
in the community space are set up to deal with some of the issues you
raise:
* Education, the ubuntu-learning project is kicking off a structured
mechanism for teaching and educating users, sys-admins, contribut
On 03/07/09 08:00, Tim Hawkins wrote:
> Would the production of a system similar to the "Yahoo Answers"
> approach help with some of this, Yahoo Answers
> awards points to answers that are chosen as top answers for various
> questions, and in essence becomes a "living FAQ". Its more
> task orientat
As Ubuntu becomes more and more popular, the resources we use to
communicate within our community become saturated with the sounds made
by new and learning users. This is not a new thing, nor is it
undesirable, but unless we find ways to deal with the increasing
background noise, we have a real cha
40 matches
Mail list logo