Thanks folks,
It does sound like it is just a hardware specific bug. I will take
this upstream.
Dan
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 9/29/2010 5:05 PM, Daniel Hollocher wrote:
>> Yeah, I saw that. I think that is also on wikipedia. So maybe
>> ondemand is for battery
On 9/29/2010 5:05 PM, Daniel Hollocher wrote:
> Yeah, I saw that. I think that is also on wikipedia. So maybe
> ondemand is for battery usage. It would still be nice to have
> conservative for plugged in situations, like a desktop.
>
> I did try to google first, I just didn't see a clear answer
Yeah, I saw that. I think that is also on wikipedia. So maybe
ondemand is for battery usage. It would still be nice to have
conservative for plugged in situations, like a desktop.
I did try to google first, I just didn't see a clear answer.
Dan
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Siegfried-Angel
Hey,
Google gives me this:
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_make_use_of_Dynamic_Frequency_Scaling
"The ondemand (available since 2.6.10) and conservative (since 2.6.12)
are governors based on in kernel implementations of CPU scaling
algorithms: they scale the CPU frequencies according to the
