Op woensdag 22-04-2009 om 09:43 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef richard:
> If I opened "software sources" and looked at the 3rd party section,
> all the sources had been replaced by ubuntu i386 sources, the normal
> ones had all gone. There were about 10 or more had been added.
> I manually checked e
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:22:49 +1000
William Grant wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 05:08 +0100, richard wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:04:10 -0300
> > Derek Broughton wrote:
> >
> > > richard wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11
> > > > serve
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 05:08 +0100, richard wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:04:10 -0300
> Derek Broughton wrote:
>
> > richard wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11 server,
> > > reloaded virtualbox, it starts but borks staring the VM
> > >
> > > I ra
On 22/04/09 14:08, richard wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:04:10 -0300
> Derek Broughton wrote:
>
>> richard wrote:
>>
>>> In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11 server,
>>> reloaded virtualbox, it starts but borks staring the VM
>>>
>>> I ran apt-get update, in case I had only
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 12:08:54 am richard wrote:
> And furthermore the reason I flagged it, apart from being pissed off
> with the hassle, was if that came off one of the mirrors and your
> running something like rsync it would spread very quickly and cause
> chaos just before the release.
Wh
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:04:10 -0300
Derek Broughton wrote:
> richard wrote:
>
> >
> > In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11 server,
> > reloaded virtualbox, it starts but borks staring the VM
> >
> > I ran apt-get update, in case I had only had a part update.
> >
> > and g
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:47:55 -0400 John Vivirito
wrote:
>On 04/20/2009 10:04 PM, Derek Broughton wrote:
>> richard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11 server,
>>> reloaded virtualbox, it starts but borks staring the VM
>>>
>>> I ran apt-get update, in cas
On 04/20/2009 10:04 PM, Derek Broughton wrote:
> richard wrote:
>
>>
>> In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11 server,
>> reloaded virtualbox, it starts but borks staring the VM
>>
>> I ran apt-get update, in case I had only had a part update.
>>
>> and got this:-
>>
>> apt-get
richard wrote:
>
> In order to try and get Virtualbox up I reloaded 2.6.28-11 server,
> reloaded virtualbox, it starts but borks staring the VM
>
> I ran apt-get update, in case I had only had a part update.
>
> and got this:-
>
> apt-get: update
> Get: http://ftp.debian.org sid/main Sources
>
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:50:24 -0400
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 4:27:42 pm richard wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:07:23 -0400
> > Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:59:46 pm richard wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:17 -0400
> > > > Macken
On Monday 20 April 2009 4:27:42 pm richard wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:07:23 -0400
> Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>
> > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:59:46 pm richard wrote:
> > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:17 -0400
> > > Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:25:20 pm richar
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:07:23 -0400
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 3:59:46 pm richard wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:17 -0400
> > Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:25:20 pm richard wrote:
> > > > so I checked the software sources
> > > >
> > >
On Monday 20 April 2009 3:59:46 pm richard wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:17 -0400
> Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>
> > On Monday 20 April 2009 3:25:20 pm richard wrote:
> > > so I checked the software sources
> > >
> > > ALL the sources are now jaunty i386
> > >
> > > This is not a i386 machine
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:17 -0400
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 3:25:20 pm richard wrote:
> > so I checked the software sources
> >
> > ALL the sources are now jaunty i386
> >
> > This is not a i386 machine and all the sources were amd64 before
>
> How do you determine tha
On Monday 20 April 2009 3:25:20 pm richard wrote:
> so I checked the software sources
>
> ALL the sources are now jaunty i386
>
> This is not a i386 machine and all the sources were amd64 before
How do you determine that? sources.list says nothing about the architecture.
--
Mackenzie Morgan
h
15 matches
Mail list logo