> The best approach is to search a project/issue that you are interested
> in, which seems to be improving the laptop experience. There is also a
> lengthy document from Andreas Lloyd which lots of contacts:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ContributeToUbuntu
Thanks for the info.
The Ubuntu membership
Am Samstag, den 03.11.2007, 17:42 -0400 schrieb Tim Hull:
> Hi,
Hello Tim,
> I have been generally lurking around Ubuntu development for several
> months now (since about the Feisty release), and previously had done
> the same around the Warty/Hoary time period. Though I have found
> Ubuntu to b
On 11/4/07, Tim Hull wrote:
> Anyway, stemming from the issues I've been having, I've been quite
> interested in becoming involved in Ubuntu development. However, so far, my
> attempts have seemed futile. For one thing, I noticed a few bugs several
> weeks before Gutsy release - and posted detail
On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 00:26 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
> 3. Currently, each Ubuntu release is based on a new version of the
> core libraries and toolchain, synced from Debian testing/unstable.
> While this may mean that each version has the absolute latest and
> greatest, it also makes them more pron
On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 05:41 +0100, Chris Warburton wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 00:26 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
>
> > 2. The current default fonts look dreadfully ugly. For one thing, they
> > are MASSIVE (on Gutsy at least), and they use a type of hinting which
> > makes them look quite ugly when
On 8/26/07, Chris Warburton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 00:26 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
>
> > 2. The current default fonts look dreadfully ugly. For one thing, they
> > are MASSIVE (on Gutsy at least), and they use a type of hinting which
> > makes them look quite ugly when
On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 00:26 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
> 2. The current default fonts look dreadfully ugly. For one thing, they
> are MASSIVE (on Gutsy at least), and they use a type of hinting which
> makes them look quite ugly when compared to OS X. What I suggest here
> is to 1) revert the auto-DP
On 8/25/07, Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Heya!
>
> Wow, that previous response was quite harsh - that was probably why it
> was sent off-list.
Just realized that.
I'm still unsure which key components you want to change, or how yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heya!
Wow, that previous response was quite harsh - that was probably why it
was sent off-list.
Tim Hull wrote:
> I do follow up - in fact, I've often posted additional info on my bug
> reports as to the origin of the issue/suggestions as to what cou
On Saturday 25 August 2007 12:57:21 Tim Hull wrote:
> > The fact that you submit bug reports and do not follow up / patch them
> > yourself
> > shows a severe disinterest in *really* helping ubuntu and (like most
> > new devel's in all projects) just want to focus on the hot-dog stuff.
>
> I do fol
>
> The fact that you submit bug reports and do not follow up / patch them
> yourself
> shows a severe disinterest in *really* helping ubuntu and (like most
> new devel's in all projects) just want to focus on the hot-dog stuff.
I do follow up - in fact, I've often posted additional info on my bu
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 18:54 +0100, Chris Warburton wrote:
> I'd try making a spec page on the Ubuntu wiki
> ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com ), something like
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OutOfBoxIpodSupport (I just made that up, it
> will be a blank page), along with an entry in Launchpad. Say exactly
> wha
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 13:42 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
> I'm curious - where can I help out? I do file some bugs on launchpad,
> but hardly ever get any followup - understandable, given that many of
> the issues at hand aren't bugs per se. I have indeed come up with
> some specific ideas to help res
13 matches
Mail list logo
