On 09/04/2009 04:50 PM, Caroline Ford wrote:
> What you need to do is work out the package name of the version in
> jaunty.
>
> I looked on packages.ubuntu.com and it ends with 0ubuntu6. This means
> that there is a maintainer in Ubuntu (and unusually not in Debian). it
> does seem that the
What you need to do is work out the package name of the version in
jaunty.
I looked on packages.ubuntu.com and it ends with 0ubuntu6. This means
that there is a maintainer in Ubuntu (and unusually not in Debian). it
does seem that the fixed version is in karmic so we need to arrange a
back
Patrick Goetz [2009-09-04 11:10 -0500]:
> If a package isn't really being maintained, then it shouldn't appear
> in any of the main repositories.
Exactly, that's why it is in universe, not in main. There simply isn't
an Ubuntu maintainer for it.
As to turn this into something productive, I sugge
Am 04.09.2009 um 18:10 schrieb Patrick Goetz:
> Now, is it finally appropriate for me to say WTF?
Instead of writing hundreds of words to a mailing list, how about
filing a needs-packaging bug, how about creating a PPA with this
newer version? We're glad you found a non-working package.
> I
