On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 08:20 -0400, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> Right and thats what we do but GNU/Linux isn't about breaking the law.
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 5:47 AM, Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wasn't saying that paying Fluendo is silly etc. If people
> wish to
>
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 21:29 -0400, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> So, the next time you wish to send such a nonconstructive and
> inflaming post, why not do us a favor and send it to /dev/null
> instead.
>
Let's not begin an infinite series where each participant repeats a
paraphrase of this to th
I dunno about you but I would figure that adhering to local law would be
common sense. So, the next time you wish to send such a nonconstructive and
inflaming post, why not do us a favor and send it to /dev/null instead.
Anyhow, It seems to me that he is proposing we make it easy for people to
adh
-
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:35:30 +1300
> From: "Aaron Whitehouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Patent issues with automatic codec installation (was:
> Automatic installation of DVD CSS support)
> To: "Christofer C.
> If the debate absolutely must take place then
I originally drafted a reply addressing each of the points people have
raised. I don't agree with a lot of what has been said, but I think I
can state my ultimate point a lot more succinctly.
The implicit suggestion in the above comments is that we
On 01/12/2007, Greg K Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps a good compromise would be to default to Codec Buddy and have
> > a button for "Multiverse Codecs". When the user clicks the button,
> > they could be presented with a message *actively discouraging* them
> > from using the mu
> Perhaps a good compromise would be to default to Codec Buddy and have
> a button for "Multiverse Codecs". When the user clicks the button,
> they could be presented with a message *actively discouraging* them
> from using the multiverse versions and highlighting that they are
> likely to break t
