Forgot to say, for completeness:
Yes any PV with a single VG with a single LV will do.
Or conversely any VG with a single PV with a single LV will do.
1. Any type of LVM setup is probably going to be fine.
2. DD the entire disk including partitions including LVM partition (PV)
is going to b
Robie Basak schreef op 23-01-2017 12:58:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Xen wrote:
Perhaps you could say the intent of my message is to urge a newer
version
for 16.04 as well, but that is up to you. I just wanted to state the
issues
here.
This won't happen unless someone intereste
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Xen wrote:
> Perhaps you could say the intent of my message is to urge a newer version
> for 16.04 as well, but that is up to you. I just wanted to state the issues
> here.
This won't happen unless someone interested in the problem files a bug.
If you want
Gave you the wrong reference.
"https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2017-January/msg00013.html";
Is the right one.
I wrote
"It immediately replaced the good PV with the bad PV (that I was trying
to change) so I cannot actually get to the "bad" PV (which is duplicate)
to change it withou
Robie Basak schreef op 23-01-2017 12:05:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Xen wrote:
The version of LVM that ships with 16.04 cannot handle duplicate
UUIDs.
If you so much as DD a disk to another drive and run a single LVM
command,
your running system will be ruined.
Is there a bu
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Xen wrote:
> The version of LVM that ships with 16.04 cannot handle duplicate UUIDs.
>
> If you so much as DD a disk to another drive and run a single LVM command,
> your running system will be ruined.
Is there a bug report on this somewhere, please, with
