On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since F-Spot is installed by default Mono is now part of the base
> install. So outside of all the debate around Mono, have we considered
> installing Banshee as the default media player in Intrepid now that
> Banshee 1.0
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 18:11 -0700, Dylan McCall wrote:
> What if, for example, I really like
> 60 Second Science and want those clips randomly placed in between my
> music? --Can't do, unless I manually drag and drop from Podcasts to
> Music Library. This is a similar foolishness to expecting the
> At UDS, we actually looked hard at the experience of Music players and
> playing - and both Banshee and Rhythmbox fared very badly, and we were
> quite rude about both of them ;)
>
> The Banshee authors got a list via Jorge Castro, and Rhythmbox authors
> will be getting lots of bugs filed for t
Op maandag 09-06-2008 om 20:38 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Scott James
Remnant:
> At UDS, we actually looked hard at the experience of Music players and
> playing - and both Banshee and Rhythmbox fared very badly, and we were
> quite rude about both of them ;)
Personally, I use Quod Libet for mo
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>
>> There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over Rhythmbox:
>> 1) Complete iPod support (Rythmbox only supports reading from iPods)
>> 2) Lar
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
> There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over Rhythmbox:
> 1) Complete iPod support (Rythmbox only supports reading from iPods)
> 2) Large support for reading and writing from various media players.
> 3) Integration with
Am Montag, den 09.06.2008, 21:47 +0300 schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
> Is there any interest in creating that kind of "LSB for desktop
> features" - or is there already something like this? As far as I see,
> it would help desktop testing a lot and would help with priorities in
> bug fixing.
What abo
And there goes another reason why such proposals and suggestions
should be replaced with nice, cute, understandable feature sheet aka
HIG or LSB. People don't like removed features and it should be taken
into account. And it is better to fix application than propose new
replacement. And even if you
2008/6/9 Mackenzie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was a Banshee user for about 9 months or so. That ended a year ago.
> Unless it's changed, Banshee only recognizes songs you have imported. It
> does not monitor directories for new songs, and especially not recursively.
Yep, and for this very
Am Montag, den 09.06.2008, 11:05 -0400 schrieb Darren Albers:
> Well you were correct it does work, but I had to remove all the
> content on the iPOD and then add it again for it to work. It is odd
> since gtkpod worked fine. I guess there was something wrong with the
> local database on the iP
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Evan Dandrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:20 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>> I have never been able to get Rythmbox to update my iPod nor my wifes.
>
> Then please file a bug.
>
>> The Rhythmbox webpage only says it can read from iPods and oth
My vote goes to either Rhythmbox or Amarok. I have over 100,000 songs.
Neither Exaile or Banshee seem to finish indexing that many.
Printed on 100-percent recycled electrons.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://li
I don't think rhythmbox needs to be changed, AFAIK its Ipod support
comes from libpod, witch is the same for gtkpod, amarok and exaile. It
does an awesome work at playing music and also works great if you need
to manage your library. It would be nice to change it for amarok but all
the kde dependen
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Luke L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Full disclosure: I only tried Banshee once, briefly, and it was buggy
> as Hell. Memory aside, Exaile should be looked at. I don't know about
> its iPod support, though.
I was a Banshee user for about 9 months or so. That end
I was going to suggest Exaile, but at the moment it has a memory leak
that gets worse as it plays more music (it was taking up 800 MB!). I
know that I do not like Rhythmbox's layout or playlist functionality.
I like Amarok better than RB, but Ama doesn't detect my media keys on
my laptop like RB do
On 6/8/08, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Evan Dandrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>>> There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over
>>> Rhythmbox:
>>> 1) Complete iPod support (
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Evan Dandrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:20 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>> I have never been able to get Rythmbox to update my iPod nor my wifes.
>
> Then please file a bug.
>
>> The Rhythmbox webpage only says it can read from iPods and oth
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:20 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
> I have never been able to get Rythmbox to update my iPod nor my wifes.
Then please file a bug.
> The Rhythmbox webpage only says it can read from iPods and other
> portable devices nothing about writing.
From http://www.gnome.org/projects
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Evan Dandrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>> There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over Rhythmbox:
>> 1) Complete iPod support (Rythmbox only supports reading from iPods)
>
> No. Rhythmbox
No Banshee by default please. Apart from Mono dependencies, its memory
consumption is much higher than Rhythmbox and Audio players are always run
in the background when the user is actually doing some other work on the
system. Wasting RAM on media player is not a good idea.
Apart from that, RB i
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:43 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
> There are a couple of positives to using Banshee by default over Rhythmbox:
> 1) Complete iPod support (Rythmbox only supports reading from iPods)
No. Rhythmbox can write to iPods just fine.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Sonntag, den 08.06.2008, 14:43 -0400 schrieb Darren Albers:
> Since F-Spot is installed by default Mono is now part of the base
> install. So outside of all the debate around Mono, have we considered
> installing Banshee as the default media player in Intrepid now that
> Banshee 1.0 is released
Am Sonntag, den 08.06.2008, 15:02 -0400 schrieb Evan:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 5) Built-in support for last.fm
>
> There is a rhythmbox plugin for this included in the default Hardy
> install. If rhythmbox is kept, perhaps there should
2008/6/8 Sebastian Breier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.06.2008, 14:43 -0400 schrieb Darren Albers:
>> If we use Banshee we can get rid of Sound Juicer and gain iPod support
>> out of the box. If we use Banshee we can say to people: "Yes, your
>> iPod or other digital music player wil
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Darren Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5) Built-in support for last.fm
There is a rhythmbox plugin for this included in the default Hardy install.
If rhythmbox is kept, perhaps there should be a look at enabling it by
default.
Evan
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss ma
Am Sonntag, den 08.06.2008, 14:43 -0400 schrieb Darren Albers:
> If we use Banshee we can get rid of Sound Juicer and gain iPod support
> out of the box. If we use Banshee we can say to people: "Yes, your
> iPod or other digital music player will work out of the box. Just
> plug it in and go."
26 matches
Mail list logo
