Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Markus Hitter [2008-11-20 17:01 +0100]: > Well, if you edit a system file as a normal user, you'd have to provide > the password, don't you? That's like "vi" vs. "sudo vi". Right, but sudo always times out quickly, whereas PK privileges potentially stay forever. Also, sudo is a mechanism to run o

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-20 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:01 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > Am 20.11.2008 um 16:29 schrieb Martin Pitt: > > > There goes the remaining bit of user/admin separation which we have, > > and we can just as well have anyone work as root in the first place. > > Well, if you edit a system file as a normal

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-20 Thread tacone
> This "strawman" sounds awfully similar to a mass feature request. Like a largely ignored mass requested feature :). Stefano -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-dis

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-20 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 20.11.2008 um 16:29 schrieb Martin Pitt: > There goes the remaining bit of user/admin separation which we have, > and we can just as well have anyone work as root in the first place. Well, if you edit a system file as a normal user, you'd have to provide the password, don't you? That's like

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-20 Thread Martin Pitt
tacone [2008-11-19 13:56 +0100]: > What I've been told is the gedit implementation was *not hard to do*. That sounds overly optimistic to me. In order to teach gedit to edit system files as normal user, you need a PolicyKit protected backend which runs as root (probably D-BUS activated). This mea

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-19 Thread Cody A.W. Somerville
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:29 AM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Olá Remco e a todos. > > On Wednesday 19 November 2008 01:47:15 Remco wrote: > > But as a temporary fix, Gedit could implement PolicyKit. > > Not only gedit but every other editor (kate,kedit, etc) This "strawm

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-19 Thread (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
Olá Remco e a todos. On Wednesday 19 November 2008 01:47:15 Remco wrote: > But as a temporary fix, Gedit could implement PolicyKit. Not only gedit but every other editor (kate,kedit, etc) -- BUGabundo :o) (``-_-´´) http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net Linux user #443786GPG key 1024D/A1784E

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-19 Thread tacone
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:01 AM, tacone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I talked some time ago (1 year) to a gedit developer and he told me >> that he had a bunch of other things to accomplish things. He wasn't >> countrary in line o

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-18 Thread Remco
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:01 AM, tacone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I talked some time ago (1 year) to a gedit developer and he told me > that he had a bunch of other things to accomplish things. He wasn't > countrary in line of principle. It has been mentioned that the best way to fix this is to

Re: [strawman] partual support of apps for policykit for Jaunty

2008-11-18 Thread tacone
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:31 PM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the lon subject, but it says it all: > This is one of those next-release subjects that keeps coming. Is there any > interests in discussing on the UDS and starting patching most used apps > (mostly e