Correct and I explained this to the OP when they mailed me off list.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Benjamin Kerensa [2013-06-24 13:17 -0700]:
>> Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
>> do. If your interested in getting the default se
Benjamin Kerensa [2013-06-24 13:17 -0700]:
> Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
> do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
> of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
> upstream.
For the re
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alexander Hanff
wrote:
> Why would it have to occur upstream?
>
It wouldn't necessarily but making such a change would create a delta that
Ubuntu would carry. I really cannot see Ubuntu changing a default search
engine provider when it has its own gaps in user pri
scuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Proposal to change default search engine
Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
ups
On 24 June 2013 21:17, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
> do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
> of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
> upstream.
The G
Ubuntu does not have a default search engine although the browsers it ships
do. If your interested in getting the default search engine changed in one
of the browsers available in Ubuntu that kind of a push would have to occur
upstream.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Alexander Hanff wrote:
Ok. Understanding this, what is the proposal? To change the default search
page of Ubuntu on all browsers?
[]s
Alexandre Strube
Sent from my touchpad
Em 24/06/2013 21:31, "Alexander Hanff" escreveu:
> >I'll just leave this here:
> >
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-w
>I'll just leave this here:
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa
>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/new-leaks-british-intels-direct-from-fiber-taps-worse-than-the-us/
GCHQ are UK Intelligence service and have zero jurisdiction in the Nether
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alexander Hanff
wrote:
> After launching NoDPI.org and successfully chasing Phorm out of the UK and
> EU, I took up a position at Privacy International, where I headed up their
> Digital Privacy portfolio for 3 years.
I'll just leave this here:
http://www.guardia
:04
To: Alexander Hanff
Cc: Ubuntu Devel Discuss
Subject: Re: Proposal to change default search engine
What is the difference between this company and duck duck go, or what would
be the benefit of this over, say, have such measures implemented
client-side?
[]s
Alexandre Strube
Sent from my
What is the difference between this company and duck duck go, or what would
be the benefit of this over, say, have such measures implemented
client-side?
[]s
Alexandre Strube
Sent from my touchpad
Em 24/06/2013 19:56, "Alexander Hanff" escreveu:
> Hi list,
>
> ** **
>
> Introduction
>
>
Hi list,
Introduction
---
In light of the recent scandal regarding the NSA's surveillance programme
PRISM and the fact that all US Corporations or Non-US Corporations with
facilities within the US are vulnerable to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISC) orders under the Fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
