Re: PIE on 64bit

2013-04-19 Thread John Moser
On 04/19/2013 08:25 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 18.04.2013 20:25, schrieb John Moser: Meant to go to list On Apr 18, 2013 2:15 PM, "John Moser" wrote: On Apr 18, 2013 2:07 PM, "Insanity Bit" wrote: On 64bit multiple services (pulseaudio, rsyslogd, many others) are shipping without Positio

Re: PIE on 64bit

2013-04-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 18.04.2013 20:25, schrieb John Moser: > Meant to go to list > On Apr 18, 2013 2:15 PM, "John Moser" wrote: > >> >> On Apr 18, 2013 2:07 PM, "Insanity Bit" wrote: >>> >>> On 64bit multiple services (pulseaudio, rsyslogd, many others) are >> shipping without Position Independent Code. On 32bit

Re: PIE on 64bit

2013-04-18 Thread John Moser
Meant to go to list On Apr 18, 2013 2:15 PM, "John Moser" wrote: > > On Apr 18, 2013 2:07 PM, "Insanity Bit" wrote: > > > > On 64bit multiple services (pulseaudio, rsyslogd, many others) are > shipping without Position Independent Code. On 32bit there is a potential > performance hit for startup

PIE on 64bit

2013-04-18 Thread Insanity Bit
On 64bit multiple services (pulseaudio, rsyslogd, many others) are shipping without Position Independent Code. On 32bit there is a potential performance hit for startup time... but there shouldn't be any performance hit (or negligible) on 64bit. "PIE on x86_64 does not have the same penalties, and