Re: Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-04 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:37 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > Could you point out where this was advocated as a fix? The only > supported configuration for /etc/fstab is using UUID= and LABEL= for all > devices. OK, here's a bug where the reporter advocated a rename to /dev/h??? - https://bugs.

Re: Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-04 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:37 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:43 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > Are people that relabeled their partitions with /dev/h??? syntax (rather > > than UUIDs) going to get notice that things are going back the other > > way? Are people wh

Re: Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-04 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:43 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > Are people that relabeled their partitions with /dev/h??? syntax (rather > than UUIDs) going to get notice that things are going back the other > way? Are people whose systems were allegedly fixed going to be > forewarned that they may

Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-03 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
Hi, The "SATA disk is in PATA mode with kernel 2.6.20-16-generic (piix claiming SATA controller on ICH4/ICH5 Intel chipsets)" aka "the great renaming" ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/117314 ) has been around for a week and it appears that the patch that led