Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

2016-11-19 Thread Philip Colmer
Hi Christian Yes, you have correctly identified the diff. Just to make sure I understand correctly, you want me to mark the *Mailman* bug that I linked to as New again? I don't want to get yelled at by the GNU Mailman people if I'm doing the wrong thing :) Regards Philip On 18 November 2016

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

2016-11-19 Thread Philip Colmer
Thanks for your help with this, Christian. Very much appreciated. Regards Philip On 18 November 2016 at 09:57, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Philip Colmer > wrote: > >> Just to make sure I understand correctly, you want me

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

2016-11-18 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Philip Colmer wrote: > Just to make sure I understand correctly, you want me to mark the > *Mailman* bug that I linked to as New again? > I'll try to clarify. The linked bug is a mailman bug you are right on that. What has to be done is to add an Ubuntu Task for

Re: Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

2016-11-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Philip Colmer wrote: > It looks as if https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1251495 has not > been applied to the ubuntu package for Mailman. I have checked both > 1:2.1.16-2ubuntu0.2 and 1:2.1.16-2, and Tagger.py has the bug in it. > Hand-altering the file to i

Bug in ubuntu package for Mailman

2016-11-17 Thread Philip Colmer
Hi It looks as if https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1251495 has not been applied to the ubuntu package for Mailman. I have checked both 1:2.1.16-2ubuntu0.2 and 1:2.1.16-2, and Tagger.py has the bug in it. Hand-altering the file to implement the fix does correct the problem. This is a high i