Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> At UDS I was asked to look into which boost packages we should target for
> Karmic. Currently we have boost (1.34), boost1.35, boost1.37, boost1.38, and
> boost-defaults in Karmic.
One question about boost1.38 + karmic:
I reported
Scott Kitterman [2009-05-28 11:03 -0400]:
> At UDS I was asked to look into which boost packages we should target for
> Karmic. Currently we have boost (1.34), boost1.35, boost1.37, boost1.38, and
> boost-defaults in Karmic.
Thanks for looking into this!
> Debian is transitioning to an unversi
Scott, thanks for pointing this out!
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
> libboost-dev is provided by boost (1.34) and boost-defaults (1.38.1). The
> archive version of the binary is 1.38.1. This means that packages that
> depend
> on the old (1.34) version of libboost-dev will likely fail to build.
