On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:25:14PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Paulus Esterhazy wrote:
>
> > This bug, or this group of bugs, will be a source of annoyance to many
> > users. Basically, when you use restricted drivers (both NVidia and ATI),
> > your sy
On 10/18/07, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Paulus Esterhazy wrote:
[snip]
> > I hope this doesn't sound ungrateful. Ubuntu developers are doing a very
> > good job overall, and dealing with binary blobs isn't an easy task. It's
> > alright
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Paulus Esterhazy wrote:
> This bug, or this group of bugs, will be a source of annoyance to many
> users. Basically, when you use restricted drivers (both NVidia and ATI),
> your system will fail to resume from hibernation most of the time. As
> restricted
Hello developers,
> There's the decision to ship with a kernel that breaks
> suspend/resume on any machine using ATI proprietary drivers (and
> Nvidia I think, but by that point we'd rolled a custom kernel to fix
> the Ubuntu breakage).
This bug, or this group of bugs, will be a source of annoyan
jdong wrote:
> If you have any other constructive solutions or suggestions, we'd be
> more than happy to hear them out.
The existence of angrykeyboarders will become more and more painful and
Ubuntu gets more and more users. The current system has a scalability
problem and convincing people t
On Oct 16, 2007, at 2:06 AM, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
...
I've been running Gutsy for a little over two months now. In part
because I wanted to help out. But it's quite disheartening to file bug
reports (some of which are seemly serious) only to find that they don't
merit any kind of respo
On Monday 15 October 2007 23:10, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
> Sarah Hobbs spake thusly :
> > Yay for unproductive mails!
>
> My first "productive" email here was completely ignored.
>
That's a step up from this one.
You're unignored, but certainly not making progress on getting stuff fixed.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:25:36 +, Scott
spake thusly:
> On a related note, the last comment (as of this writing) in thhis bug is
> a week old and it's from none other than Richard. He asks "So are we
> pushing a gutsy release next without this patched anywhere?"
>
> Well R
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:24:47
+0100, Scott James Remnant spake thusly:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 03:46 +1000, David MacKinnon wrote:
>
>> On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > You mentioned udev in your mailing list post -- clearly you have some
>>
I understand your frustration -- I too have reported bugs that have not
seen a resolution. It's bound to happen, on a distribution where the
users far outnumber the developers. There's a finite number of
developers and they are doing the best that they can. You seem to be
implying that all the de
Sarah Hobbs spake thusly :
> Oh, just let me wave my magic wand, and fix it all!
Good luck. There are scads of bugs with "Undecided" status on them.
You've got your work cut out for you even with that magic wand.
> Yay for unproductive mails!
My first "productive" email here was completely ign
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 03:46 +1000, David MacKinnon wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You mentioned udev in your mailing list post -- clearly you have some
> > reason to suspect it should be fixed there, otherwise why mention it
> > all?
>
> Because the ot
On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mentioned udev in your mailing list post -- clearly you have some
> reason to suspect it should be fixed there, otherwise why mention it
> all?
Because the other person in the bug thought so enough to ask the udev
maintainers opini
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 03:18 +1000, David MacKinnon wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you can successfully argue why it's a udev bug, why is this argument
> > not in the bug and why is the bug still marked "Incomplete" ?
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/u
On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can successfully argue why it's a udev bug, why is this argument
> not in the bug and why is the bug still marked "Incomplete" ?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/132373
I didn't, I filed against cryptsetup wh
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 01:04 +1000, David MacKinnon wrote:
> On 10/15/07, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is not very constructive. All of us here put our heart and effort
> > into the distro and comments like this don't help. Exactly what things
> > are bug-ridden that need attention
On 10/15/07, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not very constructive. All of us here put our heart and effort
> into the distro and comments like this don't help. Exactly what things
> are bug-ridden that need attention? It's one thing to raise awareness of
> last-minute important bugs
Matthew Garrett spake thusly:
> With the exception of the Thunderbird and timidity issues (and I can't
> reproduce the timidity one here at all), every bug you've responded to
> in gutsy appears to be down to your issue with Hal. And, judging by the
> log there, your system was entirely broken:
John Dong spake thusly on 317253208 ::
> This is not very constructive. All of us here put our heart and effort
> into the distro and comments like this don't help. Exactly what things
> are bug-ridden that need attention? It's one thing to raise awareness of
> last-minute important bugs, but this
Onno Benschop spake thusly:
> On 15/10/07 07:31, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
>> till the release of the most bug-ridden Ubuntu release yet (unless the
>> devs go into overdrive in the next few days)!
>>
>
> I have to say that I was quite offended by your statement. It's not
> constructive in
On 10/15/07, Martin Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that there are always going to be people who are frustrated
> by one thing or another. Lets hope that Don Kelly can find the time to
> work out his problems and let us know what the problems where. Unless
> your providing real answers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh, just let me wave my magic wand, and fix it all!
Yay for unproductive mails! Sometimes i wish even ubuntu-devel-discuss
was moderated, so we don't get utterly useless mails like this.
Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
> till the release of the most
On 14/10/2007, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not very constructive. All of us here put our heart and effort
> into the distro and comments like this don't help. Exactly what things
> are bug-ridden that need attention? It's one thing to raise awareness of
> last-minute important bu
This is not very constructive. All of us here put our heart and effort
into the distro and comments like this don't help. Exactly what things
are bug-ridden that need attention? It's one thing to raise awareness of
last-minute important bugs, but this seems to be nothing more than
flamebait
John
With the exception of the Thunderbird and timidity issues (and I can't
reproduce the timidity one here at all), every bug you've responded to
in gutsy appears to be down to your issue with Hal. And, judging by the
log there, your system was entirely broken:
03:13:09.373 [W] ids.c:294: Couldn't
On 15/10/07 07:31, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
> till the release of the most bug-ridden Ubuntu release yet (unless the
> devs go into overdrive in the next few days)!
>
I have to say that I was quite offended by your statement. It's not
constructive in any way and it does not reflect the am
Really? I haven't been paying too much attention this time around. I
was planning to upgrade once the release comes out. Is there a
website which lists all of these bugs so that I can figure out which
to avoid or, at least, which affect me?
DonK/
On 10/14/07, Scott (angrykeyboarder) <[EMAIL PR
till the release of the most bug-ridden Ubuntu release yet (unless the
devs go into overdrive in the next few days)!
--
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
©2007 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.c
28 matches
Mail list logo
