Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

2008-06-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 01:34:31PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Denis Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think this is a corner case at all. For one thing, propietary > > applications might just don't play a role _because_ there is no really > > good di

Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

2008-06-23 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Denis Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think this is a corner case at all. For one thing, propietary > applications might just don't play a role _because_ there is no really > good distribution method for them - the typical chicken-and-egg problem. >

Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

2008-06-23 Thread Richard Hughes
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 16:18 +0200, Denis Washington wrote: > The problem I currently see with single-click install is that it still > relies on a single package format (.rpm), so there would have to be > several packages of the same application again. Another particular > problem I see is security:

Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

2008-06-21 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Denis Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some time ago, it was discussed on an LSB face-to-face meeting that an > API should be developed that allows ISVs to install sotware packages > which integrate into the package manager - the "Berlin Packaging API". > Whi

Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

2008-06-21 Thread Denis Washington
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 06:59 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Denis Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some time ago, it was discussed on an LSB face-to-face meeting that an > > API should be developed that allows ISVs to install sotware packages > > which integrate