Re: [RFC] apturl repository whitelist application process

2009-02-16 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:28:53AM +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote: > Olá Alexander e a todos. > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 10:24:49 Alexander Sack wrote: > > However, if necessary, the repository may actually be removed from the > > users' sources lists. This may be necessary if there are

Re: [RFC] apturl repository whitelist application process

2009-02-15 Thread (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo
Olá Alexander e a todos. On Thursday 12 February 2009 10:24:49 Alexander Sack wrote: > However, if necessary, the repository may actually be removed from the > users' sources lists. This may be necessary if there are severe > problems on the repository such as data lose errors, security > problems

Re: [RFC] apturl repository whitelist application process

2009-02-15 Thread (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo
Olá Alexander e a todos. On Friday 13 February 2009 11:16:39 Alexander Sack wrote: > > Some repos will want to replace system packages (eg medibuntu)...this > > seems incompatible with these requirements. > > I am not sure what medibuntu does. Is that a derivate? Its a 3rd party repo with licens