Hello,
A belated follow-up to this discussion.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 02:43:57PM -0700, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> On 2018-05-14 12:38, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > this is a cost largely paid by Canonical (both in terms of
> > infrastructure, and in terms of engineering work t
likely that, having taken the decision to drop the
architecture, we would then decide to reintroduce it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
ould continue
bearing these costs out of pocket on the grounds that some other companies
are unwilling to update their software to an ISA from this millennium :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
for 20.04-based Ubuntu
Core, we also wouldn't pull them from the archive until a decision is made
*not* to support them.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Develo
this. Most people don't look
at this information, however; I think that for packages that we know won't
be LTS security-supportable on a particular architecture, we should consider
dropping those binaries from the archive as well.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever lo
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:33:49PM +, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:12:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > E, no. Anything that's in main is LTS-supported. As of 16.04, this
> > should be 100% guaranteed; if it's not supported it wouldn'
d of support that we mean when we talk about the support that Canonical
provides for packages in main - and which does encompass all of main, not
just packages that are seeded on images.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Hi Jamie,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:31:51AM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 03:08 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - For packages in universe that aren't seeded in any of the Ubuntu flavors,
> >this final freeze is nominal; packages must be manu
the
resources to track down all such upstream fixes themselves, so the best way
to help get a bug like this fixed is if you can help identify the upstream
commit that fixes the bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it
Hi Leslie,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:58:41AM +0200, Leslie Viljoen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> > If you have bugs which you believe should be listed there but aren't yet,
> > please get in touch with me or another member of the rele
oblem on xfs, which has
been an install option for years.
So this is a sound reason for users to not use ext4 for their Ubuntu 9.04
installs if system reliability is a problem for them (as it is for most of
us), but not a reason for pulling ext4 out of the release.
--
Steve Langasek
ime for release. Thank
> you for helping test-drive jaunty!
What has been the outcome of this testing? The upgrade was fairly painless
for me, but I know that may not be indicative; are there still race
conditions outstanding that pose a risk to the stability of the jaunty
release?
--
Steve L
s a possibility for Karmic.
> That should make the flicker time for graphics after resuming from suspend
> shorten considerably.
I believe he's talking about hibernate rather than suspend, where the
largest cost is reading the kernel image back from disk.
--
Steve Langasek
nstalling the
intrepid kernel on a Debian etch system. That's not exactly something that
would have been prevented by pulling the alphas.
So there's not really any evidence that leaving the alpha images up was a
reckless decision. From what I see, the announcements and warnings that
w
Oi Fernando,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:33:13PM +0100, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote:
> Olá Steve e a todos.
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008 20:24:24 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please find below the meeting minutes from the August 8 release meeting,
> > also available in the
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:21:15AM -0400, Cyrus Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Steve Langasek
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > According to the published Intrepid release schedule at
> > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyReleaseSchedule>, the first Intre
Ciao Vincenzo,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:54:32AM +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 09/04/2008 alle 12.36 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > Hi Wouter,
> > > > If there are other bugs that you believe are important to fix before
> > > > the
&
Hi Wouter,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:08:36PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Steve Langasek
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The list of release-critical bugs is tracked here:
> > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-8.04
>
his same error, so the
best way to get it fixed for the official release is to make sure yourself
that it's reported.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubu
19 matches
Mail list logo
