Hello Loic,
I agree with you that working in the integration of the Media Center
into Ubuntu should come prior to the Ubuntu Media Center distro ( at
least with the actual development force). But we can still do both in
parallel if some are interested in developing on either one or the
other of th
Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote:
>> Thank you for this constructive comment. Technically speaking, it'll be
>> very hard to have every section GUIs merged into one (as those are
>> different applications). So there is 2 solutions I
cribe to those list, please look at the video here
http://wattazoum.fr/Optimised-usage-of-Ubuntu-mailing.html to use NNTP
with gmane.
Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote:
> Remco wrote:
>> (I could've sworn that I hit Reply to All... oh well, I'm sorry for
>>
Remco wrote:
> (I could've sworn that I hit Reply to All... oh well, I'm sorry for
> the double emails to you, Greg. )
>
> I sent the following to Greg an hour ago:
>
> I think that a simple renaming or merging isn't going to fix this. The
> complete configuration system has to be thought out. So
Cory K. wrote:
> Just wondering. Do any of you know how this is technically implemented
> and what it could possibly effect?
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
Well, it depends on what you want to do. If the point is just to change
the menu layout and labels , it only affect gnome-menus. But to change
an entry
Milan Bouchet-Valat a écrit :
> Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) a écrit :
>> I like the proposal. Moving from
>>
>> System
>> | -> Preferences
>> ` -> Administration
>>
>> to
>>
>> Configuration
>> | -> Your Prefere
> But even if it's there, I would propose the following renaming:
> System->Configuration/Preferences
> Preferences->Your Preferences (as I agree with Greg)
> Administration->System configuration
>
> V
>
I like the proposal. Moving from
System
| -> Preferences
` -> Administration
to
Configura
Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> I read what you explained in the bug report, and here are a few remarks.
> Clarifying the confusion around Preferences & Administration is IMHO a
> good idea, since every base user seems to have problems with it.
>
> Naming them "User Preferences" and "System Administr
Dear developers,
I am working on a bug on Launchpad
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/174277 and I suddenly though
that I might ask here if the effort I am doing are worthy ( I wouldn't
like to work a lot on this bug and have my patches refused :-) ) .
So could you please have a look
Joel Bryan Juliano a écrit :
> What happened to those SoC 2006's "Ubuntu Welcome Center?" and "Panel
> Switcher?"..
> the last time I checked them out through svn around 5 months ago, is
> still the same files I have now.
>
> It's really disappointing that those people actually have resources to
>
Cody A.W. Somerville a écrit :
> The default IS the standard.
>
> The ability to change the default is just apart of that standard in case
> there is a need to change the default.
>
Ah ! ok, I now understand, thank you both for your explanations :-) .
(I'll now implement it on my software ;-) )
Christopher James Halse Rogers a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 02:51 +0200, Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum)
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am very happy to see that Gutsy started to implement the XDG
>> specification. That makes a cleaner and more usable d
Hello,
I am very happy to see that Gutsy started to implement the XDG
specification. That makes a cleaner and more usable desktop. But is it
decide to implement the whole specification :
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html
In the specification there is some env var
Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> i thought about a gui to configure xorg.conf and execute some commands
> to say to the gpu "hey now you have to show with second head too" !
That's it. a gui that is firstly meant to work with xorg, but can also
use gpu api.
> how did fedora ? they don't care about gpu mo
One should exist, which, at least, would be a layer for GPU specific so
that every one would know where to go to configure its dual screen .
(``-_-´´) -- Fernando a écrit :
> There are a afew, but they are GPU specific, lie for NVidia, and ATi.
> There none, for my onboard Intel.
>
> On 3/12/07,
Michael R. Head a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I just came across www.getdeb.net today. The goals appear to be similar
> to those of the backports project (to provide the latest versions of
> desktop apps for previously released versions of Ubuntu).
>
> However, they also have a number of packages availabl
David Farning a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 20:13 +0800, Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:
>
>>
>> What the hell is wrong with everyone!! Hey Wake UP!!
>> Ubuntu is a ROCKIN' Distribution, can't you not see?!!
>> It got Shipit!! Kubuntu! Xubuntu! Don't be ignorant!!
>> We are the f*ckin Rockstar here
Milan a écrit :
> I think this kind of use is a main target for Ubuntu, and using no
> password at all should be proposed to the user when he creates an account.
that was in your message date 22.02.2007 14:46 on my computer.
So I understood *no password at all* .
Now that you're saying clearly t
> Moreover, this feature won't bring down security at all: you still need
> to enter your password to use gksudo, or ssh... This is only an old
> Unix-geek reflex putting down Windows about its lacks. But this is not a
> lack, even Windows has many! Linux power is that you can enable almost
> a
Milan a écrit :
> Hey, you guys have a geek way of thinking I didn't expected to encounter
> on an Ubuntu mailing list ! I'm not talking about five-year-old
> children's ability to type in a password, nor of the need of their
> parents to control them. I'm talking of making life easier to users
Milan a écrit :
> Martin wrote:
>> This should not be necessary at all. gdm's configuration program
>> already offers the option of automatic login (which should stay off by
>> default, of course). If this does not work, can you please file a bug
>> against gdm?
> This is working fine. But it was t
21 matches
Mail list logo
