On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mackenzie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:36 +1100, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
>> Take the intel 3945 card, for example. Vincenzo says it doesn't work
>> for him, under various modes. Various users on the forums have also
>> mentioned that the
Hello there!
I wrote a small document about Ubuntu Brainstorm trying to summarize
what's going on there (with a few stats), what you can expect from it,
a summary of the most wanted features from its users, and its impact.
I wrote this hoping to give to contributors and developers (not
limited to
I wrote a blueprint on this Summer-of-code-like event. If anyone is
interested to comment, discuss... it's here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntu-own-summer-of-code/
Nicolas
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubsc
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Alan McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm speaking as someone who has taken part in the SoC as both a
> student and a mentor. From what i've seen, a SoC project always ends
> with the possibility of your code being bundled as part of a
> distribution or a
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Christian Csar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Finally, to make potential
> > contributors benefit from it, the "pupils" would be asked to put
> > online a "report" where they would explain how they worked.
> >
> Who is being defined as a contributor here? Isn't
Hi!
[You are receiving this mail because either you are suscribed to the
ubuntu-devel-discuss/ubuntu-qa ML or you are registered as a moderator
in Ubuntu Brainstorm]
Hardy is now out, and the UDS and FOSScamp are next. The ideas at the
Ubuntu Brainstorm website will, or will not be a great source
Very nice review, a lot of attention to detail.
Let's hope it won't be forgotten in the depth of the ML, like many
other great things... Have you directly contacted the authors?
Nicolas
On Jan 7, 2008 8:16 PM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I did a walk-through and compiled
On Nov 12, 2007 2:15 PM, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 14:06 +0800, Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
[...]
>
> For the simplest installations, GRUB could perhaps read /etc/shadow and
> accept any user's password -- but that would
On 11/10/07, Thilo Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicolas Deschildre wrote the following on 10.11.2007 07:06
>
> <<-snip->>
>
> > Thanks for the pointer.
> > But then, why not use this password feature by default to avoid anyone
> > to edit boo
On 11/11/07, Chris Warburton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 17:41 +0100, Thilo Six wrote:
> > Milan wrote the following on 10.11.2007 16:56
> >
> > <<-snip->>
> >
> > > All in all, I'd rather suggest to activate password-locked GRUB, but I
> > > understand this question is har
On Nov 4, 2007 6:35 PM, Oystein Viggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * ["Nicolas Deschildre"]
>
> > My point was not about the parameter itself. My point was about the
> > ability to edit the kernel parameters while booting.
> > IIRC lilo won't allow y
you that.
>
> Op zondag 04-11-2007 om 11:20 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Nicolas
> Deschildre:
> > hi!
> >
> > I was wondering about the rationale of allowing anyone to easily boot
> > root (by adding the 'single' parameter to the kernel command line w
hi!
I was wondering about the rationale of allowing anyone to easily boot
root (by adding the 'single' parameter to the kernel command line with
grub).
While I can understand it on a server, which must be physically
protected to be really secure, IMO it is pretty bad on workstations.
I know that
The items in the gnome control panel are already grouped by categories
(Hardware, Internet, system,...).
Why not used theses groups in the System menu? Instead of current
preferences/administration?
This way it has advantages of both the system menu and the control
panel : access easiness and logic
Ouch, my words are a little confusing.
What i means is grouping items of the preference menu in themed submenus.
And the same thing for administration menu.
But not merging both menus!
Sorry for the lack of clarity.
Nicolas
On 10/28/07, Nicolas Deschildre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi!
I was wondering if it might be a good idea to update the policy to
group preferences/administration items (in the system menu)...
Right now, with a few additionnal programs installed, the list of
items is longer than my 900px-height screen. I have to look several
times to search and find what
int or explanation on what you are
planning? I would be interested to know what's your plans :)
>
> I agree that this would be a great feature for Launchpad in the future,
> but it will be useful to start with a prototype first.
>
> Henrik
>
> Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
&
;d like to
hear from Launchpad guys about the possible implementation of the
spec.
Thanks!
Nicolas Deschildre
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
18 matches
Mail list logo
