nt" Apps accessing the internet the same as I would for a "nefarious"
app--it's about the connection behavior not what's it's trying to do.
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:41:43 +0100
> From: m...@canonical.com
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subje
Yeah. This seems like a great way to solve the problem. As I understand it this
is what Cyanogenmod is implementing and what I wondered if ubuntu would
incorporate. The cyanogenmod method shouldn't need more than one dialogue to
accomplish this.
> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:14:45 +0100
> From: ro
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:57:57 +0100
> From: m...@canonical.com
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Privacy features in Touch (cyanogenmod)?
>
> > I agree this is a good model. Still, I worry about the possibility
> > of having a lot of "are you sure" dialogs in a nicely i
Let me tell you guys something I find really ANNOYING on iPhone:
I turn on Airplane mode, and then I go to use an App. I get prompts telling me
Airplane mode is on (yes, I know Airplane mode is on). I'm getting these
prompts because the App wants to use the internet. But it is an App that
DOESN
Love the full-phone encryption option available on Android phones. I
assume ubuntu-touch should have phone encryption option cause of its
compatibility with the Desktop.
Will Ubuntu-Touch offer users a full-phone-encryption setting when released
that requires password at every startup/boot?
Matthew Paul Thomas, thanks for your email describing the features you plan to
work on. Your proposed work sounds great! I agree with your assessment about
Android's setup being less than ideal and everything in your email is spot on.
Your design plan is fantastic! I really appreciate that some
I wish more software companies developed built-in Privacy features and
user-control of app internet connections.
The internet is a PUBLIC space and I don't like software companies working to
put all my data there--including my local searches--while simultaneously doing
nothing to bring enhanced
