Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server

2010-11-18 Thread Mathias Gug
work (which is different from having access to the Internet). > It's really much better to do the whole installation in one go, IMO. Agreed. And there is only one choice for the whole installation: a minimal/lean install (as the tasksel screen would be removed from the installer - or replaced

Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server

2010-11-18 Thread Mathias Gug
ed collections of software by running the following command: sudo tasksel --section server

Re: Ubuntu Desktop Security Defaults

2009-04-14 Thread Mathias Gug
297/2/ > > The key criticisms of Ubuntu server raised by Linux magazine are: This article and its content is already being discussed on the ubuntu-server mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/2009-April/002777.html -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.

Re: syslog-ng as default system logger...

2009-01-13 Thread Mathias Gug
cation [1]. [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/sysklogd-to-rsyslog -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Ruby on Rails support in Intrepid - call for reviewers and cheerleaders

2008-08-19 Thread Mathias Gug
ce of > anything provided through the distro. Am I missing something? > Nope - you're right. Binaries installed by the gem command will be used in place of binaries provided by packages since /usr/local/bin comes first on the PATH. I assume that users installing gems from source (ie with

Re: Ruby on Rails support in Intrepid - call for reviewers and cheerleaders

2008-08-19 Thread Mathias Gug
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:01:26 -0700 Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:15:15PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:11, Neil Wilson wrote: > &

Re: Ruby on Rails support in Intrepid - call for reviewers and cheerleaders

2008-08-19 Thread Mathias Gug
he necessary hooks to do so and Neil used the update-alternatives system to handle multiple version of gems being installed in /usr/local/bin/ rather than /usr/bin/. -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Did we really release 8.04?

2008-07-07 Thread Mathias Gug
# Launch the upgrade tool: sudo do-release-upgrade # Follow the on-screen instructions. [1]: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading#head-e059d5452a24b50d09c64df48058ef2d834eb197 -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu D

Re: Oracle

2008-03-07 Thread Mathias Gug
think you want the ubuntu-users list. This list is for talking about what > should go into the next release and new features and things. You should also try the ubuntu-server mailing list [1]. [1]: http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http

Re: Software Inclusion

2008-02-13 Thread Mathias Gug
s a Desktop is well-know, the Server Edition is also getting attention lately. Upcoming features for Hardy include better virtualization support and Active Directory integration. Any help and suggestions are always welcome ! [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/. -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Deve

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

2008-01-31 Thread Mathias Gug
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:23:47PM +0100, Dries Desmet wrote: > Is that version 4.0.4 of authtool? What packages are involved in this > spec? Also, can't find a link on [1] for yesterday's meeting. Is it > available somewhere? The specification refers to Likewise Open [1]. I've posted the minut

Re: AppArmor

2008-01-31 Thread Mathias Gug
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:17:49PM +0100, Fabio Marzocca wrote: > is from Nov. I was speaking about a GUI for apparmor: why will it be > included in Server? I thought it was a useful tool for desktops too. > Upstream has a gnome applet to monitor AppArmor events. However it's not packaged in Ubu

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

2008-01-31 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi Fabrizio, On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:17:00PM +0100, Fabrizio Balliano wrote: > > This looks like a server team blueprint to me so you might try their > > specific mailing list. > > I'll try but it doesn't seem to me to be a "server only" task because > we're talking about authenticate a workst

Re: AppArmor

2008-01-31 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi Fabio, On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:04:47PM +0100, Fabio Marzocca wrote: > I have browsed thru the wiki and launchpad, but I didn't find a clear > statement about ongoing apparmor development for Hardy. The state of AppArmor in Hardy can tracked in the wiki [1]. If you're interested in helping o

Re: libapache-asp-perl (LP #145741)

2008-01-28 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi Dan, On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:02:25PM +, Dan Sheridan wrote: > I'd like to see this package re-added to Hardy. What is the best > approach? Should I prepare an updated package with trimmed dependencies > and upload to REVU? Should it be renamed libapache2-asp-perl? > The process to get

Re: Package: hsqldb-server; Version: 1.8.0.8-1ubuntu1; Description: Java SQL database server

2008-01-17 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi Tim, On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:21:24PM +0100, T. Friske wrote: > i found an error in the init script /etc/init.d/hsqldb-server. You find the > changes I made attached as a patch file. Could you file a bug report in launchpad [1] and attach your patch to it ? [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/

Re: LDAP intergration

2008-01-16 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi, On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:34:07PM -0800, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: > the impression that this would be along the same lines as the "DNS > Server", "LAMP Server", etc options that you are given during the > install. I am naively terming them "meta-configurations", but what is > the real

Re: apt-cacher in main

2007-11-16 Thread Mathias Gug
Hi Oliver, On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:15:34PM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: > searching for package proxy solutions in apt-cache reveals: > > apt-proxy - Debian archive proxy and partial mirror builder I've used apt-proxy for some time, but switch to apt-cacher. apt-proxy would hang quiet often w