Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Fink
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Tuesday 09 June 2009 7:43:37 pm Mark Fink wrote: >> obviously some of the forum moderators are novell employees (or people >> who drink they're koolaid) who are censoring respectable people like >> neighbor

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Fink
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Christopher Olah wrote: >> Ubuntu is a centralised entity. No external person can control e.g. why >> we have a custom search in the home page of firefox by default. People >> who can't tell the difference will keep using a "different" google, but >> there is not eve

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Fink
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:58 PM, David Schlesinger wrote: > Mark Fink continues to scribble: >> >> luckily only stupid people who can't think for themselves fawn over >> MONO...some of the forum moderators are novell employees (or people >> who drink they're

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Fink
reates GNOME while badmouthing KDE and splitting the Linux community. with friends like him, who needs enemies? > and working on from there. I can't think of any similarly significant > contributions from Mark Fink or from Paige Thompson. Why would I "respect" > your view more tha

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Fink
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Christopher Olah wrote: > It appears to me that the most important point has been forgotten: the > accusations of censorship. This, if true, is very alarming... > > We can bicker over Mono all we like, but if people are being censored, > like the OP suggests, someth

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Fink
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > 2009/6/9 Derek Broughton >> >> Sorry, but no.  You are pretending to have a rational discussion, while >> dismissing perfectly valid arguments. >> >> > The codecs are >> > not-in-Ubuntu the same way as Wine, because they are not install

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Fink
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Remco wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Luke L wrote: >> This guy is trolling you hard. REALLY hard. > > Who is trolling me? I think Mark Fink can use some communication > skills, but he has a certain point somewhere deep down. Wine an

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Fink
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Monday 08 June 2009 7:54:19 am Mark Fink wrote: >> as benfrank said yesterday on boycottnovell: >> >> "The solution seems obvious and easy: don’t make Mono or Mono apps >> part of the default install.

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Fink
it's only because MONO people have poisoned your minds and infiltrated ubuntu to get power to enforce their will. On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Sunday 07 June 2009 7:48:45 pm Mark Fink wrote: >> this is what the MONO developers want you to believe, bu

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Fink
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Stephan Hermann wrote: > Good Morning, > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:36:29 -0400 > Mark Fink wrote: > >> [...removed totally annoying article...] > > As I'm not a MONO Fanboy myself...and sometimes boycott novell does > write goo

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Christopher Olah wrote: >> there is proof posted in both articles > > There are specific events pointed to. I don't think your realize the > severity of the accusations you're making (or supporting...). You are > accusing members of the FOSS community of deliberately

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
you sound like a typical M$ appologist. do you sleep well at night? hope they are paying you well. On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Dylan McCall wrote: > I'm assuming that the fact Microsoft's Silverlight download page > automatically links Linux users to Moonlight (quite tastefully!) > suggests th

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Christopher Olah wrote: >> this is what the MONO developers want you to believe, but no one >> really wants MONO. users still using MONO only do so because they've >> been tricked by miquel & co who worship m$ and will do anything to >> help them destroy linux. >> >>

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Christopher Olah wrote: >> I hope you get rid of MONO. only then can your reputations be restored. > > I'm sorry... You want Ubuntu to drop a FOSS program because it's > developers are allegedly being problematic? I can't follow this train > of thought. > > I don't t

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Steve Reilly wrote: > Mark Fink wrote: >> A short while ago, Roy Schestowitz wrote >> http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/01/banning-opposition-to-mono/ which >> has some disturbing evidence of MONO supporters actively censoring >> good hones

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Sunday 07 June 2009 6:36:29 pm Mark Fink wrote: >> this is OUTRAGEOUS! And on top of that, Roy has noted that you guys >> are actively hiring MONO developers like the GNOME-DO developer!?!? No >> wonder your distro

shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
A short while ago, Roy Schestowitz wrote http://boycottnovell.com/2009/06/01/banning-opposition-to-mono/ which has some disturbing evidence of MONO supporters actively censoring good honest and concerned people such as Neighborlee on the ubuntu forums and today I read some even MORE disturbing news

Re: making deals with M$

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
Trying to censor me? I see how it is. On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > [..] > > please stop posting to ubuntu-devel-discuss. > > Thanks, > Stefan. > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

Re: making deals with M$

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 07 June 2008 21:18:09 Mark Fink wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Richard A. Johnson >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Mark Fi

Re: making deals with M$

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
our keyboard. >>> >> >> Spoken like a true Microvell shill. >> > > Richard A. Johnson sees no problem with the technicalities of openSuSE > and Mark Fink has problems with Novell. Not only are they mostly > opinion, one is political and the other is technical but utt

Re: making deals with M$

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Richard A. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Mark Fink wrote: > [...] > | Just like OpenSuSE != Novell, but no one in their right mind would > | want to run that distro due to the taint for the same reason! &g

Re: making deals with M$

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 19:04:02 -0400 "Mark Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I just read this article: >>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/ >> >>I hope

making deals with M$

2008-06-07 Thread Mark Fink
I just read this article: http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/ I hope this is wrong or I will have to stop using ubuntu and find another distro to use. Such a shame... Hope you are all proud of yourselves. Mark -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists