Re: Wiki & SSL

2010-10-08 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Right, though if that site is *delivered via ssl* and the cert is from > a trusted organization, you can trust the source of that information.. > if you click "history" you know you're getting the real history. > > So if the attacker did not re

Re: Wiki & SSL

2010-10-08 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > With SSL, this will at least show some very serious warnings about > the SSL certificate. Even if he just redirects from the http port > on wiki.ubuntu.com to https on his evil server, he will have to > change the name, and the attack has yet an

Re: text-mode console font

2010-09-04 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Alexey Ten (Lynn) wrote: > sudo dpkg-reconfigure console-setup I ran it and it said: Your console font configuration will be updated the next time your system boots. If you want to update it now, run 'setupcon' from a virtual console. update-initramfs: Generating

text-mode console font

2010-09-04 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
Hi, I've recently seen that the console font (I mean the CTRL+ALT+Fn console) used on my system does not support the diacritics specific to the Romanian language (but other symbols like € and đ were missing too). These characters are rendered as small squares. This is particularly annoying as some

Re: Suggestion: Leaky temp directory with encrypted home directories

2010-07-02 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Ubuntu.  For this reason, I usually put my /tmp in a tmpfs in memory >> (on systems where I have a few GB of memory). > [...] > This is not always true.  Contents of a tmpfs can be swapped to disk[1] > and you might thus leak information w

Re: Replace F-Spot with Solang?

2010-05-15 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mario Vukelic wrote: > I don't have an ongoing problem with the importing of photos, since new > photos are on the camera's SD card anyway, and of course I want to have > them copied somewhere. Though yes, initially it *was* a big step to give > up on my existing d

Re: man 2 write - clarification

2010-03-18 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote: > The following phrase taken from man 2 write manual page is confusing: > POSIX  requires that a read(2) which can be proved to occur after a > write() has returned returns the new data. > > I think you should you some comas to make a clear st

Re: White-on-black terminal should be default

2010-03-03 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Rene Veerman wrote: > use a ~/.bash_profile to set your colors? It's already configurable in gnome-terminal's settings. Not sure what you want to put in the .bash_profile to make this work. Anyway, this discussion is getting a bit old and not of interest to everyo

Re: White-on-black terminal should be default

2010-03-03 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Shentino wrote: > My personal opinion is that the default should be gray on black like the vc. > For some reason the terminal colors just work better that way, particularly > with midnight commander in a shell in a term. > my two cents. Opinions, opinions. Everyone

Re: remove the myspell-ro package from Lucid

2010-02-12 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Arne Goetje wrote: > I have updated the dependencies for language-support-writing-ro already > to include hunspell-ro instead of myspell-ro. So, if nothing else > depends on myspell-ro, it should not be pulled automatically anymore. Ok thanks :) There's just one

remove the myspell-ro package from Lucid

2010-02-12 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
Hi, Until Lucid the Romanian dictionary was received from the myspell-ro package. This package has an old version of the dictionary. In Lucid a new package (hunspell-ro) with newer version of the dictionary was generated from the openoffice.org-dictionaries source package. As the older package is

bad virtaal packaging?

2010-02-06 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
Hi, I'm sending this email here because you're listed as package maintainer for virtaal: Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers If you look at http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/virtaal/ you'll see that the: * source package version is 0.5.1. * binary package version is 0.4.1 (no source p