Bug#1044860: csh: Fails to build source after successful build

2023-08-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: csh Version: 20110502-7 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buildpackag

Re: install ruby1.9.1

2011-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/11 at 15:21 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: > I happen to think that /usr/bin/ruby should be managed by alternatives, > and I also think that Debian is the place to raise that point, as I > think Ubuntu should continue to follow Debian, to do otherwise would be > preposterous. I think that mana

Re: install ruby1.9.1

2011-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/11 at 10:06 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:24 -0600, Peng Yu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I installed ruby1.9.1. But there is not a symbolic link from ruby to > > ruby1.9.1 (the executable). I'm wondering if ubuntu deliberately not > > to make a link from ruby to ruby1.9.1

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-06-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
d need to be raised. I don't think that people are complaining about "Ubuntu" not giving back. Ubuntu is a community, and cannot really "give back" or "contribute" itself. Members of the community can "contribute" or "give back", but they are individ

mailing list for cross-distributions collaboration

2008-03-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
is the best one, or user support. Don't hesitate to forward this mail to all interested parties. Let's make this mailing list something useful together! -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024

Re: Automatically sync new packages until feature freeze

2008-01-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/01/08 at 13:53 +0100, Michael Bienia wrote: > On 2008-01-20 23:19:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea, but what about doing the same for > > packages which aren't a new upstream release? If the Debian maintainer > > up

Re: Automatically sync new packages until feature freeze

2008-01-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
x27;m not 100% sure it's a good idea, but what about doing the same for packages which aren't a new upstream release? If the Debian maintainer uploaded a new debian-specific version, it's likely to be a bug-fixing upload. It might be harder to automatize, but still... -- | Lucas

Bug#460025: gcc-snapshot: please change the Maintainer field of this package

2008-01-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
d messages about gcc-snapshot are never accepted. Which means that a lot of mails is just going to a blackhole. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing l

Some questions about Ubuntu

2007-09-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
ing? - Do you think that this should move to a seperate mailing list? Would you participate in such a mailing list? - Can you suggest a project that could host such a mailing list without annoying anyone? :) - Any other suggestions? Thank you for reading me so far -- and for answering my questi