Re: Fwd: user space probe in ubuntu 14.04

a1c7.debug > > Indeed, and now dwarf-based function/statement probes can be resolved against > mysqld. > > >> The information that Gareth provided indicated that they already had >> mysql-server-core-5.5-dbgsym installed, so perhaps this problem is >> entirely ex

Fwd: user space probe in ubuntu 14.04

From: Frank Ch. Eigler Date: Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:35 PM Subject: Re: user space probe in ubuntu 14.04 To: Gareth Cc: David Smith , system...@sourceware.org academicgareth wrote: > http://paste.openstack.org/show/462471/ > [...] >>>probe process("/usr/sbin/mysqld"

Re: problems about dependency of mysql-server-5.5-dbgsym

Thanks Colin :) I have a better understanding for 'updates' repo now :) On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:11:01PM +0800, Gareth wrote: >> I know this. But at the first time I enabled ddebs' trusty only (no >> trusty-u

[packages] python 2.7 and systemtap markers?

Hey guys Are python2.7 binaries from official packages compiled with systemtap markers? -- Gareth Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distributed Storage, Fitness, Basketball OpenStack contributor, kun_huang@freenode My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistakes in my email from Mar 1 2013

Re: problems about dependency of mysql-server-5.5-dbgsym

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Robie Basak wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:51:11AM +0800, Gareth wrote: >> the same package from different (but related) repo has different >> dependencies. One is '(= 5.5.35+dfsg-1ubuntu1)' and another is '(= >> 5.5.44-0

problems about dependency of mysql-server-5.5-dbgsym

ncies. One is '(= 5.5.35+dfsg-1ubuntu1)' and another is '(= 5.5.44-0ubuntu0.14.04.1)'. The first on from trusty and breaks in installation if I don't set ddebs' trust-updates in apt source. Is that a bug? -- Gareth Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distributed Storage, F

Re: User education on first boot post install

On Monday 12 July 2010 08:26:48 Dane Mutters wrote: > This seems to be a really good idea. I'm not a programmer, but if > somebody implements it, it'll make a lot of users happy. > > On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:21 +0200, Gareth McCumskey wrote: > > Hi there guys, >

Re: Shouldn't update-manager's "check for updates" setting have an "hourly" option?

nabled? > > > Scott K I am going to be the devil in this discussion and just ask .. is this even necessary? Sure, might be a "nice to have" option, but are hourly update checks really worth the effort. I honestly cannot think of a single bug (even security related) that would

User education on first boot post install

thing like this started. Regards Gareth McCumskey -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss