Even if you have X, another problem is that ubuntu-bug and apport ignore
the $(HTTP_PROXY|http_proxy) variable, so it becomes very difficult to
file bugs from work if you're behind a non-transparent proxy.
-Original Message-
From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
[mailto:ubunt
apt-get source apache2-mpm-prefork should set you on your way.
Add -g to the CFLAGS in debian/rules, and then I think "make -f debian/rules"
will be all you need. I'm neither an ubuntu nor debian developer, so anybody
please correct me if I'm wrong. :)
---
From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@li
Not sure what precisely those strings are from, but I can tell you right now
what they ARE (along with the "lists of commands") after looking at /bin/ps
That's the function table for the binary. The "@" sign you're seeing is
actually represented as "^@" (one character, not two) - it's a null cha
I'm with you on vim (and also changing the /etc/alternatives/vi alias on its
install -- the number of times I've hit a cursor key while in insert mode only
to shake my fist at the monitor...)
Oh well, hjkl is where it's at anyway, right? :)
I'd never heard of tree until just now - seems like it
.10 I heartily
approve!
Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu-
> devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Ethan Baldridge
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:59 AM
> To: Shentino; Morten Kjeldgaard
> C
Out of curiosity, what does "do-release-upgrade" do that editing your
sources.list, "sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop &&
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade" wouldn't do?
> -Original Message-
> From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu-
> devel-di
I just edit resolv.conf anyway and fix it the next time it “breaks” (every time
I log into my company VPN, even though I have the PPPoE client set to not apply
DNS settings from the DHCP server). For a personal computer, I can just keep
editing; I have to fix the default route every time anyway
Conn said:
- Fonts currently look over-sized on the default configuration (96dpi, 10pt,
subpixel smoothing & slight hinting)
This is the problem I believe. Why is the default always 96dpi instead of the
correct information from the EDID?
$ xdpyinfo | grep -e "\(resolution\|dimensions\)"
dimen
esday, October 07, 2009 5:56 PM
To: Ethan Baldridge
Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: Default vfat file permissions - why executable?
2009/10/7 Ethan Baldridge :
> But those still put an executable or a symlink into one of /usr/local/bin ||
> /opt/bin || /usr/loca
-Original Message-
From: Brian Vidal [mailto:dae...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:07 AM
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Cc: Ethan Baldridge
Subject: Re: Default vfat file permissions - why executable?
>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:45:37 -0400, Ethan Baldri
Dwarf Fortress comes as a .exe as well, but again, it should be run with
the included shell script (./df).
Also, I think any C# apps have the ".exe" extension on the binaries by
default.
But .exe files run with Wine (separate from ELF binaries or CIL stuff
which have a .exe extension) shouldn't n
Worked fine today, thanks.
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 17:15 +0800, DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Ethan Baldridge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did Ubuntu's FTP manager change their GPG key in the past couple of
> > days? When I ran a
bffi5
Install these packages without verification [y/N]?
And of course I answered "heck no!" I looked on the wiki and didn't see
anything about it...
I'm running the Jaunty alpha, if that makes a difference, though I don't
think it should.
--
Ethan Baldridge <[EM
Currently `apt-get install git` gives one a virtual package for "gnuit"
from universe, which is some sort of midnight commander-alike. This
seems rather odd considering that a) the program already has another
name and package (gnuit), and b) a far greater audience would associate
"git" with the sou
14 matches
Mail list logo