MS promises to not sue over Mono

2009-07-06 Thread Christopher Olah
Greetings all! Given that there has been some turbulence on this risk over Mono (namely the threat of patents and alleged censorship), I think it's worth drawing attention to this post: The ECMA C# and CLI Standards by Peter Galli (http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-s

Re: My Suggestions on ISSUE, MOTD, & lsb-base-logging.sh

2009-06-13 Thread Christopher Olah
> I got halfway through a project that would solve broadly the same > problems as your /etc/issue proposal. It faltered when Launchpad kept > attaching the blueprint to Drupal and the merge proposal didn't go anywhere. > > The would-be blueprint is still available[1], the bug in Launchpad has > bee

My Suggestions on ISSUE, MOTD, & lsb-base-logging.sh

2009-06-13 Thread Christopher Olah
es color in many situations. In any case, thanks for taking the time to read and consider this email, Christopher Olah -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Christopher Olah
> Ubuntu is a centralised entity. No external person can control e.g. why > we have a custom search in the home page of firefox by default. People > who can't tell the difference will keep using a "different" google, but > there is not even way to get some discussion around this (I tried in the > p

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-09 Thread Christopher Olah
It appears to me that the most important point has been forgotten: the accusations of censorship. This, if true, is very alarming... We can bicker over Mono all we like, but if people are being censored, like the OP suggests, something is _very_ wrong. Just my $0.02... Christopher -- Ubuntu-de

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Christopher Olah
> there is proof posted in both articles There are specific events pointed to. I don't think your realize the severity of the accusations you're making (or supporting...). You are accusing members of the FOSS community of deliberately censoring and suppressing people. You are asking for people to

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Christopher Olah
> you sound like a typical M$ appologist. do you sleep well at night? > hope they are paying you well. And your sounding like a bloodhound. Attacking everyone in sight is not the way to handle this. If you want to get this problem fixed, be polite. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-de

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Christopher Olah
> this is what the MONO developers want you to believe, but no one > really wants MONO. users still using MONO only do so because they've > been tricked by miquel & co who worship m$ and will do anything to > help them destroy linux. > > this is all well documented at boycottnovell.com So, your sa

Re: shameful censoring of mono opposition

2009-06-07 Thread Christopher Olah
> I hope you get rid of MONO. only then can your reputations be restored. I'm sorry... You want Ubuntu to drop a FOSS program because it's developers are allegedly being problematic? I can't follow this train of thought. I don't think Mono is a particularly useful language myself, but people are