Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y

2022-08-09 Thread Bernd Schubert
On 8/9/22 18:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: We are in the process to upstream out changes. We got disrupted by other work for our main product but will continue to send new patches soon. However, as expected getting the patches upstream takes time, which is replacing the module might be helpfu

Re: Ubuntu initramfs (Was: Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y)

2022-08-09 Thread Bernd Schubert
On 8/9/22 19:08, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Hi, On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote: On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at all. What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an

Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y

2022-08-09 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hi Dimitri, On 8/9/22 15:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Hi, On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 14:22, Bernd Schubert wrote: Hello, I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as statically into the kernel instead of using a module? Reason I'm asking is that we are curr

any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y

2022-08-09 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hello, I would like to ask if there is a good reason Ubuntu builds fuse as statically into the kernel instead of using a module? Reason I'm asking is that we are currently working on a couple of fuse improvements and a) A static module makes development a bit harder, I cannot take any quic