rd.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> If you have a support contract with Canonical, then maybe Canonical has a
> support obligation, but Ubuntu, in particular for proprietary software,
> has no
> support "obligation".
>
> Scott K
>
> On F
proprietary Nvidia drivers - even
worse.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> AG Restringere wrote:
> >> If you have a support contract with Canonical, then maybe Canonical
> >has a
> >> support obligation, but Ubuntu, in particular for propr
It's very simple:
Nvidia "certifies" a driver in the "long lived branch", when it releases a
new stable driver it recommends every Linux user to install that driver
immediately for the best experience. Ubuntu has a support obligation make
the latest most up-to-date "certified" drivers available t
By the way, if you would like to see Ubuntu embrace a rapid-release cycle
and release really fresh Nvidia drivers the bug I filed was upgraded to
Wishlist meaning you can actually vote for it being implemented by logging
in to your www.launchpad.net account clicking on "this bug affects me" and
cli
Something that has really frustrated me about Ubuntu is how nvidia-graphics
drivers packages are never kept in sync with the upstream release schedule.
As a former Windows user I learned a long time ago that the way to achieve
the best performance from your machine was to keep up to date with offi
