On Dec 21, 2014 7:59 AM, "Marcus Pollice" wrote:
>
use the Debian/Ubuntu patchset, which is what I will look at more closely
now. I suspect that maybe one of these patches changes something that
affects performance for small data sizes. Is there some documentation
available somewhere which patch c
On 12/20/2014 06:45 PM, Alex Oh wrote:
> http://git-blame.blogspot.com.es/2014/12/git-1856-195-205-214-and-221-and.html
>
> There is a vulnerability with git pull. Would be great if the git package can
> be
> updated to version 2.2.1.
>
> The current version is 1.9.1.
>
This issue is being tra
On 21 December 2014 at 00:45, Alex Oh wrote:
> http://git-blame.blogspot.com.es/2014/12/git-1856-195-205-214-and-221-and.html
>
> There is a vulnerability with git pull. Would be great if the git package
> can be updated to version 2.2.1.
The link suggests it is only relevant on Win and OS X, or
On 21 December 2014 at 00:45, Alex Oh wrote:
> http://git-blame.blogspot.com.es/2014/12/git-1856-195-205-214-and-221-and.html
>
> There is a vulnerability with git pull. Would be great if the git package
> can be updated to version 2.2.1.
>
> The current version is 1.9.1.
On which version of Ubun
On 21.12.2014 06:26, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Note that these days compilers optimise C at times much better than
hand-crafted (crippled) assembly.
I'm aware of this, but it's still not universally true. Also this would
have to go to the upstream developers.
Plus if one has compatible CPU
http://git-blame.blogspot.com.es/2014/12/git-1856-195-205-214-and-221-and.html
There is a vulnerability with git pull. Would be great if the git package
can be updated to version 2.2.1.
The current version is 1.9.1.
Thank You
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubunt
