On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 4:11 AM, David Raphaël wrote:
> However, I am a bit concerned about package management and I think that
> Ubuntu should develop (or improve) its own package management system in
> order for the distribution to be more administrators friendly.
I'm sorry, but you can't cite
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your answer.
I really like your idea of showing only the .desktop in the scope and the rest
with synaptic. A return of synaptic as the default package management tool
would make a lot of people happy.
However, my idea was a little different. As I said, I don't know exact
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:39:26AM -0700, I.E.G. wrote:
> I don't often respond .
Personally I ignore the entire GUI update package. I use
dselect or apt-get at command line, and if issues arrive
I use dpkg --force-whatever's to fix them.
The command line is far faster and more powerful for many
I don't often respond .
Unity was and is a total abortion . If I wanted a tablet or glass-phone OS
I'd own a tablet or glass-phone. Unity just sucks . What sucks more is that
it is force fed . Having to install something you despise to get something
you want is in no way a pleasant experience .I
Hi everyone!
With the recent development of Unity8, I have noticed that the Ubuntu Software
Center is becoming an App Store equivalent, which I think is fine. For me, the
Ubuntu Software Center should focus on applications and not on packages.
However, I am a bit concerned about package manageme
