Sorry for sending this to you twice, Bryan, but my first attempt is stuck in
the moderation queue.
2014-03-07 1:18 GMT+05:30 Bryan Quigley :
> *Network Restart*
> I'd like to start by asking each of you what you think is the correct
> way to restart networking on Ubuntu server? Feel free to writ
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:39:40AM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> > Lots of us only use a GUI as a place to let us keep 40
> > xterm's available...
>
> Could you detail what process you are exactly using to do this
> reliably? Are you using bonds/vlans/bridging?
On my current job, I am using a la
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:02:33PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:44:07PM -0800, Dale Amon wrote:
> > I often configure laptops that for security have wifi, bluetooth
> > etc all turned off at BIOS level, and the only ethernet connection
> > is not to the internet but to a d
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure this level of detail is needed.
>
> I've not tried this on Ubuntu, so maybe it already works fine, but
> similar to the OP's request on remote Red Hat systems it is always
> supported to run:
>
> service network restart
>
> and kn
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
> I don't think it's possible to define "restart networking" in a way that
> everybody understands, and in a way that will always work on complex
> configurations.
>
> Instead, I think that we need to focus on *why* you need to "restart
> networki
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 09:39 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Dale Amon wrote:
> > The only feature I hold near and dear is that I be able
> > to ssh into a server in a rack 8000 miles away, fiddle
> > with /etc/network/interfaces if needed, and then reliably
> > ifdown
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Dale Amon wrote:
> The only feature I hold near and dear is that I be able
> to ssh into a server in a rack 8000 miles away, fiddle
> with /etc/network/interfaces if needed, and then reliably
> ifdown/ifup one of god knows how many connections (I often
> work with m
previously on this list ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
contributed:
> I really appreciate it when network
> manager doesn't fight with me over the eth not having any external
> gateway. I get really annoyed if it does that, but with saucy
> network-manager and I have at least a t
On Friday, March 07, 2014 12:57:37 Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:32:17PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Why was it necessary to have discussions internally when they could
> > have been open by default?
>
> (wearing both my Canonical and Ubuntu hats)
>
> Are Canonical emplo
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:44:07PM -0800, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:41PM +0100, Stanisław Hodur wrote:
> > *Wifi + Ethernet on Desktop*
>
> Which reminds me of another common use of machines that a typical
> GUI user won't think of.
>
> I often configure laptops that for se
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:41PM +0100, Stanisław Hodur wrote:
> If talking about the network, I would add:
>
> *Wifi + Ethernet on Desktop*
> The network gets lost if you have both wireless and Ethernet connection.
> The wired network should be the preferred one, as it is usually
> faster. Or e
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:32:17PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Why was it necessary to have discussions internally when they could
> have been open by default?
(wearing both my Canonical and Ubuntu hats)
Are Canonical employees not allowed to speak to each other now? I think
you're being un
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:48:52PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> We've had a lot of internal Canonical discussions about our networking
> story and before going to a UDS session [1] it was suggested to post to
> ubuntu-devel.
>
> *Network Restart*
> I'd like to start by asking each of you what you
13 matches
Mail list logo