Re: kernel headers by default revisit...

2012-08-07 Thread Daniel Hollocher
> I run on the same platform? Do you have to use nVidia's own > drivers to get the full res? Yes -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: kernel headers by default revisit...

2012-08-07 Thread Dale Amon
This is what Linux thinks (incorrectly) about what the nVidia on the W520 can do: xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 900, maximum 8192 x 8192 LVDS1 connected 1600x900+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 345mm x 194mm 1600x900 60.0*+ 50.0 1440x900

Re: kernel headers by default revisit...

2012-08-07 Thread Dale Amon
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 07:41:59PM +0200, Christoph Mathys wrote: > I'm not an ubuntu developer, but here's how I see this: > > On 07/16/2012 10:04 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > >IMHO, the installation and updating of linux-headers-generic, > >linux-headers-3.2.0-26, linux-headers-3.2.0-26-generic

Re: kernel headers by default revisit...

2012-08-07 Thread Christoph Mathys
I'm not an ubuntu developer, but here's how I see this: On 07/16/2012 10:04 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: IMHO, the installation and updating of linux-headers-generic, linux-headers-3.2.0-26, linux-headers-3.2.0-26-generic is unneeded for ~98% of Ubuntu desktop users. So, 98% are not using nvidi