Hi!
On 16 Feb 2012, at 07:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Fabio T. Leitao
> wrote:
>> For those who have not followed this up closely, a little history.
>>
>> Remember that MariaDB is not just "compatible" with MySQL, but it kind of IS
>> MySQL, forked and re-branded.
Hi!
On 15 Feb 2012, at 00:49, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> We are unable to determine what the recent MySQL security fixes are due
> to lack of details, and unclear commit messages.
Based on our analysis of commits and bugs, we believe the CPU (critical patch
update) that Oracle released was actua
Hi!
On 14 Feb 2012, at 20:28, Fabio T. Leitao wrote:
> Remember that MariaDB is not just "compatible" with MySQL, but it kind of IS
> MySQL, forked and re-branded.
I like to say that it is MySQL, branched and re-branded with additional
features. It is not a fork. We rebase with MySQL on a regu
Hi!
On 14 Feb 2012, at 00:11, Robbie Williamson wrote:
> One thing to note, the primary motivator for this proposal isn't about
> moving to a more "open source friendly" application. We have genuine
> security concerns/issues with how MySQL handles and publishes their
> security updates. We can
Hi!
On 13 Feb 2012, at 15:20, Eddie Bachle wrote:
> As Linux gains more public recognition, more and more Windows-only
> organizations will consider using it as an alternative, especially for their
> web servers. This is especially true because of the fact that each of the
> necessarily main
@Jeremy - This is under Unity on 11.04, non-OEM install. I do have GNOME
Shell installed also, but I'm not sure how that could bork things.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Oussama Bounaim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm also affected by this i'm using ubuntu 10.04 and i have all the update
> installed, be
