Re: About ibus 1.3.7 ibus languages

2010-09-22 Thread Loïc Martin
On 22 September 2010 19:27, Aron Xu wrote: > Thirdly, the better choices for users: >  * Chinese: ibus-pinyin (ibus-chewing is better for some traditional >            Chinese users, but ibus-pinyin is still good enough comparing >            with ibus-m17n) Pinyin won't work for Taiwanese users -

Re: python app import guidelines

2010-09-22 Thread Tuomas Räsänen
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:43:32PM -0500, Stephen Burke wrote: > I am packaging up a python app to upload it to my PPA eventually. > Before this everything I have written is in one directory so all my > imports were simple. Now that I am breaking up the app and the top > level script is in a "bin"

Re: python app import guidelines

2010-09-22 Thread Tim Chavez
Stephen, Maybe using a PYTHONPATH (or sys.path.append()) to specify the top-level of your package and then touch'ing __init__py's in all the directories leading to importable packages? Maybe I've misunderstood the question though... -tim On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Burke wrote:

python app import guidelines

2010-09-22 Thread Stephen Burke
I am packaging up a python app to upload it to my PPA eventually. Before this everything I have written is in one directory so all my imports were simple. Now that I am breaking up the app and the top level script is in a "bin" directory and the helper scripts are in a "helpers" directory on the s

Re: About ibus 1.3.7 ibus languages

2010-09-22 Thread Aron Xu
Hi Shawn and all, On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:57:12PM -, Computerguy wrote: > I was wondering if you wanted to use ibus-m17 for all of the other > languages in ibus 1.3.7. I have contacted martin pitt and told him for > japanese at least using anthy is better than ibus-m17. Anthy for > japanese

Re: Ubuntu Branch reviewers

2010-09-22 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:47:46 +0300, Bilal Akhtar wrote: > Hi all, > I think it would be a *lot* better to set the reviewer of all ubuntu > branches to ubuntu-sponsors. This would prevent confusion among people > who wish to fix bugs in Ubuntu or merge packages. Such people propose a > merge and

Re: ubuntu-release delegations for unseeded packages in universe/multiverse

2010-09-22 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 22/09/10 15:45, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Very nice, organised communication, thanks Stefan! > How are the delegations working out, now that we have a couple of > substantial teams carrying their respective responsibilities? Any > observations / suggestions / concerns on your end? *cough*. Re

Re: ubuntu-release delegations for unseeded packages in universe/multiverse

2010-09-22 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 21/09/10 20:20, Stefan Potyra wrote: > For universe/multiverse packages, that are NOT found on any installation > media, Feature Freeze Exceptions [1] can be obtained from one of the > delegates in addition to ubuntu-release until the date of Final Freeze for > universe [2]: > > * mythbuntu:

Re: extending apport/problem_report format?

2010-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Edwin, Edwin Grubbs [2010-09-16 17:47 -0500]: > Launchpad.net is looking into whether to use the problem_report python > module to store website errors or even to use the apport python module > to help collect system data for the problem report. Currently, each > exception is stored in a sep

Re: Backport an non-exist package to lucid main

2010-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello YunQiang, YunQiang Su [2010-09-14 1:37 +0800]: > opencc now is in 10.10's main, but it is not in lucid. > > Can I backport it? Yes, the backport process covers that. Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer