This is not a support mailing list. This mailing list about developing
Ubuntu Operting System.
Please see help.ubuntu.com, #ubuntu, support mailing lists, ubuntuforums etc.
ps. I really don't understand your question, so when you seek help
using above support options please describe your question
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not understood about the device label being none on Ubuntu
> Server 10.04 and on Ubuntu Server 8.04 it appears to be correct.
> Please help me understand about it.
>
> On a 8.04 Ubuntu Server
>
> Filesystem Type Size U
Let's hope that with the proposed removal of F-Spot and Solang as it's
replacement, we'll see The GIMP reinstated. The first thing I did upon a
fresh install of Lucid was apt-get remove fspot and apt-get install gimp.
The decision to see The GIMP's removal by default is purely insane if you
ask me.
2010/5/15 Marco Laverdière :
>
>> Also, there were specific reasons as to why Shotwell isn't ready, but
>> for Solang it was just, yeah this isn't ready either. What
>> specifically would you like to see in Solang for it to be considered
>> ready?
>
>
> For me, wheher it is Solang (hypothetically)
> Also, there were specific reasons as to why Shotwell isn't ready, but
> for Solang it was just, yeah this isn't ready either. What
> specifically would you like to see in Solang for it to be considered
> ready?
For me, wheher it is Solang (hypothetically) or Shotwell (as
announced), a de
Why was Shotwell chosen over Solang? It seems the only motivation for
shotwell is to try Vala. Solang seems to already be in line with what
we need and want. Is there a link to where this decision was made so
we can see the discussion rather than just an announcement? Some
people think that neither
Hi Marco,
See my comments below.
2010/5/15 Marco Laverdière :
> Hi,
>
> Here are my views on the decision to replace F-Spot by Shotwell:
>
> 1. I've tried the latest Shotwell version (0.5.2) and clearly, it's
> still an immature application, that can't be compared to F-Spot
> feature-wise. Right
Hi,
Here are my views on the decision to replace F-Spot by Shotwell:
1. I've tried the latest Shotwell version (0.5.2) and clearly, it's
still an immature application, that can't be compared to F-Spot
feature-wise. Right now, Shotwell doesn't even know how to import
F-Spot tags (XMP), so it w
Hi,
Here are my views on the decision to replace F-Spot by Shotwell:
1. I've tried the latest Shotwell version (0.5.2) and clearly, it's
still an immature application, that can't be compared to F-Spot
feature-wise. Right now, Shotwell doesn't even know how to import
F-Spot tags (XMP), so it
Hi,
According this article [1], Shotwell is replacing F-spot in Maverick.
Article says that this was agreed at UDS.
Kind Regards
Laco
[1]
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/05/see-ya-f-spot-shotwell-comes-to-ubuntu.html
On 15 May 2010 10:07, Danny Piccirillo wrote:
> If i remember correctly, F-
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mario Vukelic
wrote:
> I don't have an ongoing problem with the importing of photos, since new
> photos are on the camera's SD card anyway, and of course I want to have
> them copied somewhere. Though yes, initially it *was* a big step to give
> up on my existing d
As a happy F-Spot user, let me make a few comments.
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 05:07 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote:
> i still get complaints of it being slow and the fact that it requires
> you to import all of your photos into one folder is...beyond words.
(...)
> i remember the last answer i got was
If i remember correctly, F-Spot had to undergo some big changes to meet the
needs drawn up for Lucid, but i'm still not happy with it, and think it
would make more sense to adopt a photo manager that is already in line with
our needs. F-spots interface is so much nicer now, but i still get
complain
13 matches
Mail list logo
