Re: Rightness of firefox

2010-03-29 Thread Richard JOHNSON
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:08:56PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > some of those changes, in any case, could be upstreamed to be > available to any distro, not only ubuntu, I think (like the > firefox-kde patch) Right now I think Mozilla is just waiting for the KDE patch to be finalized, t

Re: Rightness of firefox

2010-03-29 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
some of those changes, in any case, could be upstreamed to be available to any distro, not only ubuntu, I think (like the firefox-kde patch) On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:19 PM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: >> I was looking today the

Re: Rightness of firefox

2010-03-29 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > I was looking today the firefox package. I noticed that there is a > huga amount of patches in that package [1]. If I remember correctly, > is against firefox license to redistribuite it with the same name, > same logo if changes a

Rightness of firefox

2010-03-29 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
I was looking today the firefox package. I noticed that there is a huga amount of patches in that package [1]. If I remember correctly, is against firefox license to redistribuite it with the same name, same logo if changes are made. If this is still true, I think ubuntu should remove immediately o

Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one

2010-03-29 Thread C de-Avillez
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Bruce Miller wrote: Hello Bruce, > I am not an Ubuntu developer; I learn a lot, however, from lurking on > this list. If this is not the right forum to raise this issue, I > would be grateful for a pointer in a better direction. I would say that you are