2010/1/7 Patrick H. :
> Isamar M>
> Given that comment, can he customize a distro?
>
Don't know. If not possible, hire someone or ask to a neighbor...
Isn't here a devel list ? :-)
> Patrick F>
> What would you recommend to make ubuntu, or just the internet alone as
> a whole, a better experien
Isamar M>
Given that comment, can he customize a distro?
Patrick F>
What would you recommend to make ubuntu, or just the internet alone as
a whole, a better experience.
What did you want to do with ubuntu?
Have you tried Ubuntu Netbook remix?
It's a very different user experience then ubuntu desk
Am Mittwoch, den 06.01.2010, 07:47 -0800 schrieb Shentino:
> I've sorta had this dance with a problem in mc that, due to improper
> perms on cons.saver, prevented the usage of C-o to flop the screen in
> and out.
>
>
> I uploaded a patch that highlighted the problem and I thought that
> someone w
Dude.. nothing can satisfy greeks and troyans at the same tme.
If you don't like it, try to find one that fit your needs at
http:///www.distrowatch.com
Or... customize Ubuntu for that.
Isamar
2010/1/6 Patrick Freundt :
> Maybe Ubuntu (and the Internet as a whole) is not my thing. But who am
>
Maybe Ubuntu (and the Internet as a whole) is not my thing. But who am
I to blame you guys for that.
I am sorry for all the inconvenience that I might have caused.
*playing Annett Louisan - Das Spiel ... only for you!*
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Mo
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Thanks.
Ja, moment noch.
Vielleicht ist das ja nur der Rotwein und die Zigarette, aber ich
erinnere mich gerade daran dass die Mama von dem Schokoladenkrümel
angeblich bei "sprint" arbeiten soll. Und die haben hier garkeine
Niederlassung.
> Can you please take it
> somewhere else?
Thanks for asking, but I am not sure whether I can or can not.
The police officer said I could possibly have a chit chat with my
psychiatrist. But I am really not sure.
I have this strange feeling that I find a solution to my problem right here.
--
Ubun
Hi
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Patrick Freundt
wrote:
> The career of this daddy poo is obviously so settled that he does not
> care at all whether I am able to gain proof for whats going on. And it
> seems to make that 21 year old chocolate girl all proud to have such a
> daddy.
>
> The onl
And since I was asked:
> Cracked wireless connection and ethereal/wireshark?
> Have you tried posting (etc.) via a VPN or SSH tunnel?
Its a wired connection to german Telekom / T-Online. No router is
involved that could have been cracked. Its a clean setup of Ubuntu
Karmic, connected via PPPoe. S
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Richard JOHNSON wrote:
> Until she hacks the Gibson, she isn't elite enough to ruin the romance you
> share with Google.
That depends, kind sir.
First of all, the 21 year old girl is a girl. Her limited skills are
not the point. Its most likely her daddy who seems
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:30:18PM +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote:
[...]
> But when nothing is supposed to influence the routing between me and
> my ISP, no cracked router, no script kiddies on IRC who know my IP,
> and only me and Google's Mail sit together, then how the heck is that
> 21 year old g
Somebody reminded me in a nice way not long ago, that no matter what
happens ... I should do my best to respect "das Grundrecht auf
körperliche Unversehrtheit". And I am going to do that.
But when nothing is supposed to influence the routing between me and
my ISP, no cracked router, no script kidd
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Patrick Freundt
wrote:
And on another note -
When your Ubuntu Karmic sits with you, Firefox and Google Mail and
somebody special is able to send your X Server a SIGTERM, then I am
wondering what this hint is all about. Am I on the right path ... of
Neo?
--
Ubunt
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Daniel Chen wrote:
> I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether
> my cynicism radar is errant.
Pure self irony from my side, as I was looking over the thread that I
started, realizing that I often forgot about the logical next step in
the
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Freundt
wrote:
> You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need
> to provide patches like him.
I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether
my cynicism radar is errant.
Are you implying that people with uplo
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Chen wrote:
> your patch
Right, I often forget about that ...
You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need
to provide patches like him.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Shentino wrote:
> Unfortunately, it recently got the wave-off as now it no longer builds under
> Lucid and I'm being asked to test a new upstream version, when I know that
I uploaded 3:4.7.0-1ubuntu1 last night, so if you're willing to respin
your patch against th
I've sorta had this dance with a problem in mc that, due to improper perms
on cons.saver, prevented the usage of C-o to flop the screen in and out.
I uploaded a patch that highlighted the problem and I thought that someone
would eventually get around to testing it.
Unfortunately, it recently got
To give those who care a bit more background information why I seem to
act like a super troll within the thread "proper procedure regarding
bug reports":
In the appartment next door a 21 year old girl lives with her mom. Her
dad seems to be working for some online university and has influence
on c
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Michael Bienia wrote:
> You know that your Ubuntu systems also checks for package updates
> automatically? So it goes online without your consent too.
As I said before, firefox is just one exaple of multiple topics.
> And I don't want a dialog popping up asking
On 2010-01-06 11:36:09 +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote:
> We dont talk about an unpleasant background color or desired or
> unwanted functionality. We talk about a default configuration of a
> browser that goes online to download data without my consent. And the
> very least to expect is that its prom
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
> What to do now?
Battle again, how we used to battle proprietary software once. Because
many people had good reasons to dislike proprietary software.
And whats happening here is that companies mix Free Software with the
old, poisoned busine
Am 06.01.2010 um 11:36 schrieb Patrick Freundt:
> ... but maybe Gentoo and other source based distributions are going to
> have a revival and Canonical is discovered as the new Microsoft.
Patrick,
just a week ago you defended Ubuntu so much and now you play with
going away? Doesn't match my c
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Robbie Williamson wrote:
> Is it a bug that we don't
> automatically enable and password protect your screensaver in Ubuntu?
Maybe.
> or that we don't automatically encrypt all your data?
Maybe.
> Perhaps you will get farther opening a bug with mozilla?...good
24 matches
Mail list logo
