i brought this up on my blog and i think that might already be the plan:
http://blog.thesilentnumber.me/2009/09/dropping-compiz-for-mutter-metacity-3.html
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 00:30, solaris manzur wrote:
> because compositing for this version is one thousand times good than compiz
>
> --
> Ubu
because compositing for this version is one thousand times good than compiz
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 16:59 -0400, Stuart Read wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Daniel Chen wrote:
> >
> > I don't think the situation is nearly as bleak as you paint it here,
>
> Hear, hear. I don't really know anything about audio but when I
> started using Ubuntu (Dapper) it was bad (f
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Remco wrote:
> Why has it not been changed in Hardy? Did it break other stuff?
Firstly, it was too late to make the change. Secondly, it breaks with
upstream's (PA's) adamant policy that (ALSA) hw: be used by default,
not dmix: or dsnoop:.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Daniel Chen wrote:
>
> I don't think the situation is nearly as bleak as you paint it here,
Hear, hear. I don't really know anything about audio but when I
started using Ubuntu (Dapper) it was bad (for me). Now, every release
the audio situation on my old craptop g
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 22:55, Daniel Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Remco wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:40, Daniel Chen wrote:
>>> The sad thing is that we could have shipped a two-line
>>> change to /etc/pulse/default.pa that would have alleviated nearly all
>>> of the (use
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Remco wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:40, Daniel Chen wrote:
>> The sad thing is that we could have shipped a two-line
>> change to /etc/pulse/default.pa that would have alleviated nearly all
>> of the (users') showstoppers. The change remains in my
>> pulseaudi
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Martin Olsson wrote:
> Sound was broken for me in all releases before hardy and then
> in hardy it worked _perfectly_ with Skype, Flash etc. Sound
Again, just because it worked for you does not mean that it wasn't
broken. If you care to look outside your hardware a
Daniel Chen wrote:
> Just because ALSA has appeared to be
> sufficient in the past does not mean that it is, or even will be,
> sufficient.
Saying that ALSA only "appeared to be sufficient" feels
Sound was broken for me in all releases before hardy and then
in hardy it worked _perfectly_ wit
Le jeudi 08 octobre 2009 à 14:14 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia a écrit :
> Ubuntu did not show particular interest in any of the above
> policies. Typically, the new software replaces the old one, period.
It's simply not true. GNOME 2.26 (ie jaunty cycle) enforced the
pulseaudio requirement and we did d
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:40, Daniel Chen wrote:
> The sad thing is that we could have shipped a two-line
> change to /etc/pulse/default.pa that would have alleviated nearly all
> of the (users') showstoppers. The change remains in my
> pulseaudio/hardy bzr branch.
Why?
--
Remco
--
Ubuntu-dev
This is my fisrt time posting here, I was watching this thread with
interest.
Debian,BSD,Fedora and others offer the Select what Software to install
at first run.
I like this for the reason that if I do not want a server or a certain
program in the install or build process, it does not occur. If I
I've just noticed that the new Evolution no long displays a paper clip
in the toolbar for adding attachments. This function has now moved to a
button at the bottom of the window.
Almost every email application in the world uses the paper clip as an
indication of adding attachments, why then did E
if i have seen correctly that the internet is required to sync. devs feel
free to comment if that isnt correct.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:34 AM, benny.gaech...@bluewin.ch <
benny.gaech...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> >> isnt the internet connection required thought to sync time with an ntp
> >> server at
would this feature be better off included in the dvd then the live cd. if
its just included in the dvd i honestly think users would start complaining
that it also needs to be in the live cd as well.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> On 25/09/09 16:52, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Hi Heikki,
So libao is currently not maintained upstream. In the appropriate IRC
channels I'm lead to believe that there are better libraries out there
that should be used instead.
If so many debian packages didn't link against it I would seriously
consider dropping it all together.
It doesn't s
>> isnt the internet connection required thought to sync time with an ntp
>> server at somepoint during the installation.
>It tries to sync, but the installation doesn't stop if it can't find an
>internet connection. There's nothing in the installer that requires
>internet (fortunately).
>Hobb
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> The real problem that nobody seemed ever to be getting is that when you
> introduce huge regressions, then you probably should 1) either not
> distribute the software yet 2) or put more energy into bug fixing for
> the particular software,
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 23:32 -0400, Daniel Chen wrote:
>
>
> Granted, fixing things upstream is generally smiled upon more so than
> focusing on a particular distribution. In the case of stellar Ubuntu
> audio bugs, perhaps contributing more than "just testing" is way
> forward?
The real problem
19 matches
Mail list logo
