On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Null Ack wrote:
> I dont think the ordinary user cares about PulseAudio or other
> internal components to their desktops. They just want audio to work.
Definitely agreed.
> 1. Not delivering reliable audio experiences in production releases of Ubuntu
Certainly,
2009/10/7 Lukas Hejtmanek :
> why there is now hard-coded pulse audio in Ubuntu/Karmic?
Simply, this approach is upstream's, and it makes sense resource-wise
to follow upstream.
More bluntly, if you'd like to contribute a novel audio framework to
Linux, particularly Ubuntu, then here's as good a
Hi Lukas,
I dont think the ordinary user cares about PulseAudio or other
internal components to their desktops. They just want audio to work.
The problem that I see is not so much about internal components, but
is about failures in:
1. Not delivering reliable audio experiences in production rele
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 23:55 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/10/7 Przemysław Kulczycki :
> > Hi devs.
> > I'd like to point your attention to a bug which might be frequently
> > noticed after Karmic is released:
> > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/438136
>
> So
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:45 +0200, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
> Hi devs.
> I'd like to point your attention to a bug which might be frequently
> noticed after Karmic is released:
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/438136
> In short: the new devicekit disk util
2009/10/7 Przemysław Kulczycki :
> Hi devs.
> I'd like to point your attention to a bug which might be frequently
> noticed after Karmic is released:
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/438136
Sorry, I thought it might be a dupe of 412152, but that might not be
Hi devs.
I'd like to point your attention to a bug which might be frequently
noticed after Karmic is released:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/438136
In short: the new devicekit disk utility (palimpsest) might report lots
of disks as failing, even the new ones
Hello,
why there is now hard-coded pulse audio in Ubuntu/Karmic?
There seem to be many users not willing to use PA at all:
http://idyllictux.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/ubuntu-904-jaunty-keeping-the-beast-pulseaudio-at-bay/
What are benefits for ordinary users? No, ordinary user really does not wa
Either way - but I'm pretty sure the current version of the Loki Installer
making the rounds still installs to ~/bin by default (for single-user install).
I was just rolling with the status quo there. :)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Wheeler [mailto:m...@funkyhat.org]
Sent: Wednesday, O
2009/10/7 Ethan Baldridge :
But those still put an executable or a symlink into one of /usr/local/bin ||
/opt/bin || /usr/local/games (or /usr/bin, even though they shouldn't) when
installed system-wide. When installed for a single user the binary goes into his
$HOME/bin (which I don't th
-Original Message-
From: Brian Vidal [mailto:dae...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:07 AM
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Cc: Ethan Baldridge
Subject: Re: Default vfat file permissions - why executable?
>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:45:37 -0400, Ethan Baldridge
> wro
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Ubuntu community,
>
> We recently shifted the responsibility for approving new Ubuntu
> developres from the Technical Board (TB) to the new Developer
> Membership Board (DMB). This, and the parallel ongoing
> archive/privilege restructurin
12 matches
Mail list logo
