Like any other descriptive characters, any name can be penned.
At any rate, mono is useful, there's a few cases I've come across were
mono just did the trick.
Of course as a technology itself, there are pros and cons. I can
advocate for and against mono. About the opportunities that it brings
as
On 2009/06/12 11:13 (GMT+0800) Christopher Chan composed:
>>> Well, as there is no "generic" MBR, what MBR do you use? The Windows' one?
>>> Mac OS X's, *BSD's?
>> I don't know what '"generic" MBR' is either. I was referring to generic MBR
>> _code_, an optional feature of an openSUSE installatio
>>> Astute multibooters whose other options include a non-Linux OS do _not_
>>> place Grub in the MBR. Better to make that the universal default, never
>>> addressing via MBR, instead leaving the MBR code generic, and using
>>> that generic code with a primary partition containing a Grub that _no_
On 2009/06/11 20:27 (GMT+0200) Markus Hitter composed:
> Am 11.06.2009 um 10:35 schrieb Felix Miata:
>> Astute multibooters whose other options include a non-Linux OS do _not_
>> place Grub in the MBR. Better to make that the universal default, never
>> addressing via MBR, instead leaving the MBR
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM, David Schlesinger
wrote:
>
> > PS David, I'm relieved you have such a cool boss and I hope you can enjoy
> > the rest of your sabbatical.
>
> Thanks, whoever-the-heck-you-are, I've been having an excellent time and the
> childishness we've seen here from the likes
Taking Luke L's advice here and not using my real name on the internet
anymore due to this insanity.
I've submitted this thread to Reddit this morning:
http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/8rmv5/mono_bashers_take_things_too_far_on_ubuntu_lists/
I'm hoping this will wake some people up to make t
Am 11.06.2009 um 21:41 schrieb Derek Broughton:
> Markus Hitter wrote:
>>
>> Am 11.06.2009 um 14:47 schrieb Derek Broughton:
>>
>>> [wrong citation snipped]
>
> I definitely didn't write that - or if I did, I'm suffering
> delusions -
> because I believe, and believe I said, the opposite
D
Hi,
OT: from OCaml
Looking for "seasoned developer" advice.
I am new to the "Debian world"... I have some packages
that I want to get into the Ubuntu repositories, but getting
them in a the "source" level (e.g. Debian) would be even
better.
How is this done?
I have just started m
Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> Am 11.06.2009 um 14:47 schrieb Derek Broughton:
>
>> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
>> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
>
I definitely didn't write that - or if I did, I'm suffering delusions -
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Dmitrijs
Ledkovs wrote:
> Cool =D With my packages it seems that ubuntu autosync is also usually
> triggered after the Debian automatic removal (superseeded packages in
> experimental and etc). Anyways so far I had to wait for autosync 0-7
> days. Plus as far I can
Am 11.06.2009 um 10:35 schrieb Felix Miata:
> On 2009/06/11 09:20 (GMT+0200) Markus Hitter composed:
>
>> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
>> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
>
> That's asking for trouble, unless only one o
2009/6/11 Michael Bienia :
> On 2009-06-11 01:25:58 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
>> > The syncs are done automatically on daily basis until DIF date.
>>
>> However, pycaml has been uploaded more that 48 hours ago in sid, and it
>> has still not
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
>
>> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
>> has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more
>> important than, say, /bin/sh
>>
>
> Putting the kernel (i.e., /bo
> Surely the BIOS doesn't actually have to be involved as long as the initial
> boot stage can find files anywhere on the disk.
>
Guess what loads the inital boot stage?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://li
On Thursday 11 June 2009 01:19:02 (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Apport can be set to do a dry run, and not submit the logs to Launchpad, but
> stored locally.
> The user only needs to get them and upload them to where s/he needs them.
> I'm just not sure if this logs are on /tmp or /var/crash
$
Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> John,
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, John Moser wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Luke L wrote:
>>> How many of these things are actually going to make it into Karmic? A
>>> dynamically sized swap file? GRUB 2 residing on its own partition,
>>> etc? These
Markus Hitter wrote:
> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
No, "really" you don't. I've tried that and it causes as many headaches as
it solves.
--
derek
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailin
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
>> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
>> has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more
>> important than, say, /bin/sh
>
> Putting the kernel (i.e., /boot) on a se
Olá Przemek e a todos.
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 12:47:24 Przemek Kulczycki wrote:
> What about the forums/answers.lp.net - will the users be able to
> attach apport's reports to forums or support requests?
Apport can be set to do a dry run, and not submit the logs to Launchpad, but
stored local
On 2009-06-11 01:25:58 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
> > The syncs are done automatically on daily basis until DIF date.
>
> However, pycaml has been uploaded more that 48 hours ago in sid, and it
> has still not been updated in karmic... or may
Christopher James Halse Rogers writes:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:35 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> John Moser writes:
>>
>> > GRUB2 on its own partition is silly. Like having a separate /boot.
>>
>> It is required for stuff like root on LVM, a configuration supported by
>> the alternate i
David MENTRE a écrit :
> * pycaml: a new version (0.82-10) has been uploaded in Debian which
> should fix the issue with Python 2.6 in Karmic after automatic import.
> I'm waiting for the automatic import.
When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
> The syncs are done automatically on da
On 2009/06/11 09:20 (GMT+0200) Markus Hitter composed:
> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
That's asking for trouble, unless only one or fewer installations actually
mount the "/boot" on
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:20 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 10.06.2009 um 21:44 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
>
> > ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
> >> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
> >> has been based around the idea that these files are
Am 10.06.2009 um 21:44 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
>> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
>> has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more
>> important than, say, /bin/sh
>
> Putting the ker
25 matches
Mail list logo
