On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 19:20 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:12 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:54 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > > However, the Control Center adds an extra click whenever you access any
> > > settings from it, because you nee
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:12 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:54 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > However, the Control Center adds an extra click whenever you access any
> > settings from it, because you need to close the Control Center once
> > you've finished. And the
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:54 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> However, the Control Center adds an extra click whenever you access any
> settings from it, because you need to close the Control Center once
> you've finished. And the "Filter" (eh?) searches only the names of the
> settings windows,
Hi there,
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 13:10 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> If you have a patch from upstream that you can confirm fixes the issue,
> I can take a look, but otherwise you're a bit too late for intrepid
> which is already into RC freeze.
I know I'm a bit late. I was hoping someone was g
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew East wrote on 23/10/08 14:37:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm working on a design to combine the "Preferences" and
>>> "Administration" m
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:54 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> The Control Center makes scanning the available settings easier, and
> avoids the increasingly-meaningless distinction between Preferences and
> Administration. And it saves two clicks (or one drag), compared with the
> Preferences/Adm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew East wrote on 23/10/08 14:37:
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm working on a design to combine the "Preferences" and
>> "Administration" menus into something more wieldy.
>
> Isn'
