Re: Debugging help

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:02:43PM -0400, Evan wrote: > I found and reported bug > #222653, > which has been reproduced by several people. > > AFAIK, it cannot yet be marked confirmed because not enough information is > present to

Firefox crash issue in Ubuntu

I was just wondering what was the fix made for this bug of firefox crash in ubuntu ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/108929 The last comment by Alexander Sack says that "should be fixed by one of the nss updat

Re: ConsoleKit (0.2.10) / PolicyKit / Security hole

Martin Pitt wrote: Michael Biebl [2008-07-19 6:47 +0200]: Problem now is, if you disable the PolicyKit support, the restart/stop functions are unprotected, and everyone (even through ssh logins) can shutdown/reboot the system. For fun try [3] from an unpriviledged user account. See src

ConsoleKit (0.2.10) / PolicyKit / Security hole

Hi, first of all, I hope that ubuntu-devel-discuss is the correct email address for contacting the Ubuntu maintainers of consolekit and policykit (taken from debian/control). I've also CCed Martin just in case. On to my actual issue: Today I started updating consolekit to 0.2.10-1 in Debian.

Re: Subversion update

Christoph Korn wrote: > I have created a debian package for subversion 1.5.0. > https://launchpad.net/~c-korn/+archive Unless there are substantive differences in packaging that are expected to break things, please use the backports process (1) to provide this type of update. There are four r

Re: Extremely large -data packages

On 2008-07-21 13:36:18 +0100, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote: > If everything else fails, you may ask LP admin if you can have it > initially on a PPA (i dont know the quota limit on PPAs, sorry), and > if it can handle safely, then ask Ubuntu reps to store it. The initial limit for PPAs is 1 GB but

Re: Extremely large -data packages

Olá Jack e a todos. On Sunday 20 July 2008 06:38:27 Jack Coulter wrote: > Basically, I am writing to enquire as to if Ubuntu would have any issues > with packages of this size? And if so, what would be the next suggested > course of action. I've read in the past that some mirrors refused to mirro