On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:01:14 +0800 "Peter Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>a. install ubuntu
>b. apt-get install yum*
>c. apt-get install git
>
>Next I tried "git", I got "command not found", but reattempted to
>"apt-get install git" will give me:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# apt-get install git
On 5/15/08, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a. install ubuntu
> b. apt-get install yum*
> c. apt-get install git
This probably hasn't installed the program you thought it would. It
turns out that before Linus developed the distributed VCS called 'git'
there was already a project call
Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 13:01 +0800 schrieb Peter Teoh:
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 211 not upgraded.
No idea if that helps, but usually, if a package install is problematic
and you have 211 not upgraded packages, you should "sudo apt-get
dist-upgrade" first to make sur
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a. install ubuntu
> b. apt-get install yum*
> c. apt-get install git
>
> Next I tried "git", I got "command not found", but reattempted to
> "apt-get install git" will give me:
The Ubuntu/Debian package for git, the revisi
a. install ubuntu
b. apt-get install yum*
c. apt-get install git
Next I tried "git", I got "command not found", but reattempted to
"apt-get install git" will give me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# apt-get install git
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information...
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 02:17 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno dom, 11/05/2008 alle 17.32 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto:
>>>
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 10:40 +0200, Vincenzo Ci
Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 02:17 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
>> Il giorno dom, 11/05/2008 alle 17.32 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto:
>>> On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 10:40 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote
>>> I wish I could configure what it considers "low."
>> You can: just laun
Le mercredi 14 mai 2008 à 21:03 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas a écrit :
> That's a much better explanation than the error message. So you're
> right, it's not a bug: it's two bugs. One is that the error message is
> unhelpful, and the other is that the CD should be ejectable if the only
> programs tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arvind K wrote on 13/05/08 13:34:
>>
>> Yesterday I was met, with what I think is one of the most stupid bugs
>> I ever found. When I tried to eject a DVDr, either using nautilus
>> tools or the drive eject button, an error popup showed up, telling me
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:47:46PM +0200, David Prieto wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> > I should also point out (because I gave out misinformation on IRC in a
> > moment of inattention) that this only works when you're using the manual
> > partitioner and select a partition to mount as /, or equivalent. I
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:05:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:57:58AM +0200, David Prieto wrote:
> > Hi Colin,
> > > I presume that you did not instruct the installer to format the old
> > > /home partition? (If you did, then why?)
> >
> > Actually yes, and I never rea
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:57:58AM +0200, David Prieto wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> > I presume that you did not instruct the installer to format the old
> > /home partition? (If you did, then why?)
>
> Actually yes, and I never realised how dumb it was until I read your
> message. I just was used to form
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
chombee wrote on 08/05/08 02:24:
>...
> But there is so much fundamentally wrong usability cruft going on here.
> This sort of incident should not be possible.
Others have discussed the backup and restore issue, so I'll address the
lower-level points:
13 matches
Mail list logo
