Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:23:47PM +0100, Dries Desmet wrote: > Is that version 4.0.4 of authtool? What packages are involved in this > spec? Also, can't find a link on [1] for yesterday's meeting. Is it > available somewhere? The specification refers to Likewise Open [1]. I've posted the minut

Re: AppArmor

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:17:49PM +0100, Fabio Marzocca wrote: > is from Nov. I was speaking about a GUI for apparmor: why will it be > included in Server? I thought it was a useful tool for desktops too. > Upstream has a gnome applet to monitor AppArmor events. However it's not packaged in Ubu

Re: metashell - User Friendly Shell

Op maandag 28-01-2008 om 09:43 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Matthew Paul Thomas: > FWIW, it's also what Darwin uses (and NextStep before it used) for the > same purpose. > Also, 'fish' has 'open' as a built-in.

Re: Crashed with signal 5

Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008 à 21:38 +0100, Thomas Novin a écrit : > Is this known? They must all be related (from a spectators view). Hi, That was due to gnome-session and an updated version has been uploaded Sebastien Bacher -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubun

[Fwd: Acceptable use of rpath]

Hey Everyone, I have posted this to -motu list and not received a response after a week, I was recommended to cross-post. After doing some additional research, the rpath stays internal. I compiled Jahwidgets (part of the Jahshaka project) and dumped the .so headers and there are no rpaths there.

Re: AppArmor

On Jan 31, 2008 6:48 PM, Mathias Gug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The state of AppArmor in Hardy can tracked in the wiki [1]. If you're > interested in helping out with AppArmor you should considering getting > involved with the Ubuntu Server Team [2] which is responsible for > taking care of AppA

Crashed with signal 5

Hello There seems to have been an enormous number of users having (including me) problems with programs crashing with signal 5 after upgrades in the last 24 hours. Every time my installation starts I get 4-5 crashes. If I try to start/use Pidgin, Evolution I get crashes. If I try to unlock some a

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

Mathias Gug wrote: > Hi Fabrizio, > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:17:00PM +0100, Fabrizio Balliano wrote: > >>> This looks like a server team blueprint to me so you might try their >>> specific mailing list. >>> >> I'll try but it doesn't seem to me to be a "server only" task because >> we

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

Hi Fabrizio, On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:17:00PM +0100, Fabrizio Balliano wrote: > > This looks like a server team blueprint to me so you might try their > > specific mailing list. > > I'll try but it doesn't seem to me to be a "server only" task because > we're talking about authenticate a workst

Re: AppArmor

Hi Fabio, On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:04:47PM +0100, Fabio Marzocca wrote: > I have browsed thru the wiki and launchpad, but I didn't find a clear > statement about ongoing apparmor development for Hardy. The state of AppArmor in Hardy can tracked in the wiki [1]. If you're interested in helping o

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

> This looks like a server team blueprint to me so you might try their > specific mailing list. I'll try but it doesn't seem to me to be a "server only" task because we're talking about authenticate a workstation against an AD, not create a AD server, anyway I'll write to the server ML too. Just

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:29:20AM -0800, George Farris wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 19:04 +0100, Fabrizio Balliano wrote: > > Hi to all, > > I'm following with a lot of interest this blueprint for hardy: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/windows-authentication-integration > > whi

AppArmor

I have browsed thru the wiki and launchpad, but I didn't find a clear statement about ongoing apparmor development for Hardy. A centralized control panel is very much needed, as a general GUI too, a-la SuSe. AppArmor is great and it could easily extend Ubuntu's installations into Companies and Ente

Re: About "Windows Client Integration" blueprint

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 19:04 +0100, Fabrizio Balliano wrote: > Hi to all, > I'm following with a lot of interest this blueprint for hardy: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/windows-authentication-integration > which will allow users to easily authenticate agains an active directory. >

Re: sound on the lenovo X.61?

Hi David David Meyer wrote: > Seems not to work. Anyone else seen this? This is not the correct list for support, please try one of the following linkshttp://ubuntuforums.org/ instead: * https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users * https://answers.launchpad.net/ * http://ubu

sound on the lenovo X.61?

Seems not to work. Anyone else seen this? Dave signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss