One of the goals for KDE in Gutsy is to support S/MIME encryption/signing by
default in kmail/kontact:
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/KubuntuGutsyPlan
One of the requirements for meeting this goal is to set "use-agent" in the
~/.gnupg/gpg.conf of the user. I've done some investigation and it seems t
> Yes, if you're already running in a virtualised environment then
> providing a mechanism for checking the system makes sense. I'm just not
> sure it's a compelling reason to move from a non-virtualised system to a
> virtualised system.
Indeed. I don't expect an integrity scanner like CDR to be *
On Jun 30, 2007, at 7:53 AM, shirish wrote:
...
1. Have a filter by distribution and/or releases. So let's say I wanna
have an overview of all bugs filed after gutsy tribe 1 onwards . Right
now thats very hard to know, the filter should work while filing the
bug so it makes easier.
I've added t
On Jun 29, 2007, at 5:16 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
...
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 08:05:45PM +1200, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
...
* "Your new operating system" is comically vague. The installer
knows very well that it's installing Kubuntu, not some other OS.
(I do not think that reducing t
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:59:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > With modern hardware the sensible thing to do is just to boot from CD.
>
> With modern hardware shutting a dom0 down might mean taking out 10+
> active, virtualized servers (in a HA environment it means live migrating
> those
> needs replacing immediately.
So if not immediately, is there a timeline for replacing md5 in the deb
package format? I'm not familiar with how these edge cases work so maybe
that's a question for the dpkg maintainers. Regardless, I imagine the best
way to replace md5 would be to offer both md5 a
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> My plan is to have them both installed by parallel, and modify
> discover-data to use -intel on new installs for everything newer than
> i945. This should minimize regressions.
>
> [...]
>
> We'll likely keep -i810 for the i8xx by default for the foreseeable
> future thoug
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:54:29 -0400
> From: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: future of xserver-xorg-video-(i810|intel)?
> To: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/pla
