Re: Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-04 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:37 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > Could you point out where this was advocated as a fix? The only > supported configuration for /etc/fstab is using UUID= and LABEL= for all > devices. OK, here's a bug where the reporter advocated a rename to /dev/h??? - https://bugs.

Re: Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-04 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:37 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:43 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > Are people that relabeled their partitions with /dev/h??? syntax (rather > > than UUIDs) going to get notice that things are going back the other > > way? Are people wh

A graceful exit....

2007-06-04 Thread Peter Whittaker
Fellow Ubunteros, Ubuntites, and other Ubuntuphiles, Balance in life is everything, and sometimes demands in one area take too much time from others. Sadly, such is the case with my Ubuntuing in various mailing list and groups and fora. In order to devote the time deserved to other priorities, I'v

Re: Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)

2007-06-04 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:43 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > Are people that relabeled their partitions with /dev/h??? syntax (rather > than UUIDs) going to get notice that things are going back the other > way? Are people whose systems were allegedly fixed going to be > forewarned that they may