Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Conrad Knauer
On 3/3/07, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/2/07, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native > > > app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 ) > > > > > > Compare: > > > > > > http

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Conrad Knauer
On 3/2/07, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native > > app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/24004 ) > > > > Compare: > > > > http://members.shaw.ca/Limulus/misc/gedit.png > > http://members.shaw.c

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: > Matthias Klose schrieb: >> Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: >>> my point with the icons was: >>> can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? >> No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested >> industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Pavel Rojtberg
Matthias Klose schrieb: > Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: >> my point with the icons was: >> can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? > > No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested > industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the industrial icon > set, which

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Conrad Knauer schrieb: > The splash screen and Help -> About still say "OpenOffice.org 2.0" > (which is > https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 ) yes, known and addressed. > The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native > app (I'm guessing its this bug: https://launchpad.n

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: > my point with the icons was: > can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? No, not in its current form as a replacement for the well tested industrial_theme. In its current form its a fork of the industrial icon set, which I do not want to maintain separat

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Pavel Rojtberg
my point with the icons was: can we have the tango-icons from the jimmac tango branch? Pavel Rojtberg schrieb: > Fonts are fine for me, but some the industrial icons are fucked up: > http://www.madman2k.net/images/0/Bildschirmfoto.png > > also the cairo-canvas seems to be still off. (oodraw image

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Pavel Rojtberg
Fonts are fine for me, but some the industrial icons are fucked up: http://www.madman2k.net/images/0/Bildschirmfoto.png also the cairo-canvas seems to be still off. (oodraw images get not anti aliasing) Pavel Conrad Knauer schrieb: > The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :) > >

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Conrad Knauer
Oh and also, in the package information in Synaptic for "openoffice.org" version 2.2.0 it says: "OpenOffice.org Office suite version 2.1" so you'll want to increment that. CK On 3/2/07, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :) Two thing

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2 release candidate 2 available for testing

2007-03-02 Thread Conrad Knauer
The upgrade from the Feisty packages worked perfectly :) Two things I noticed which are still there though: The splash screen and Help -> About still say "OpenOffice.org 2.0" (which is https://launchpad.net/bugs/78489 ) The font used in all the menus is fuzzy, making it look like a non-native a

Re: try scanmodem on feisty?

2007-03-02 Thread Matthew East
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 00:08 -0500, t u wrote: > Hi, > > A request to devels as well as anyone with free time monitoring the list :) > > Can someone who is testing feisty on a machine with a winmodem test > whether the scanmodem tool is working there and report their experience > at the *bug repor