On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:23 AM Florent 'Skia' Jacquet
wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> Here is a summary of the latest features that just landed in the
> autopkgtest-cloud web UI, just for you to enjoy:
>
> * All the pages under
> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/$package_name now have links t
We've measured significant performance improvements for several
benchmarks by using 64K pages (SPECint, sysbench mysql, and kernel
compiling)[*]. I'd therefore like to discuss whether or not we should
switch to 64K pages in vivid.
There's the question of whether or not we would be penalizing the
p
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:36:25PM -0700, Dann Frazier wrote:
>>
>> There's the question of whether or not we would be penalizing the
>> performance of other classes of workloads people want to run on arm64.
>>
[ Reorganized to use inline replies ]
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>> LP: #1586026 asks for the removal of binary packages on arm64 which cannot
>> be
>> built with OpenGL ES. Do we really have to cripple an archit
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:03:53PM -0600, Dann Frazier wrote:
>> [ Reorganized to use inline replies ]
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose wro
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I get a strange error with “mathjax” package on Ubuntu buildds.
>
> One of the binary packages (fonts-mathjax-extras) contains a lot of small
> PNG files. And with the last upload (2.7.0-2) I get this [1]:
>
> pkgstripfiles: R
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:12:23AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>> Dmitry,
>> Just a guess - but maybe the build has exhausted the builder's
>> memory? If so, you might be able to workaround i
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 04:36:25PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are currently severily limited by having turned off all arm64
> bos01 workers, and now bos01 networking being broken.
>
> I disabled bos01 arm64 workers on May 27, because it was a bit
> unstable, and xnox wante
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:02 AM Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 04:36:25PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we are currently severily limited by having turned off all arm64
> > bos01 workers, and now bos01 networking being broken.
>
> bos01 networking i
